Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 842
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance New York 20 December 2006 Entry into force : 23 December 2010 in accordance with article 39 1 which UNIV-16https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-16&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION “ROMUVA” v. Lithuania
ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION ROMUVA v. Lithuania LTU 08/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns the non recognition as religious association in 2019 of a non traditional pagan association and lack of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58447
Abramovich v. Belarus
Abramovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2702/2015 Communication number s : 2702/2015 Author: Aleksandr Abramovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2011 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2702/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3171/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems (ETS No. 189)
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems ETS No. 189 189 Strasbourg 2003 01 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States which COEETS No. 189https://rm.coe.int/168008160f
Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No. 217)
Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism CETS No. 217 217 Riga 2015 10 22T12:21:04.1 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty CETS 196 and for accession by the non member States which have COECETS No. 217https://rm.coe.int/168047c5ea
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law (ETS No. 097)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Information on Foreign Law ETS No. 097 097 Strasbourg 1978 03 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 62 and for accession by the non member States which have COEETS No. 097https://rm.coe.int/1680077973
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Additional Protocol to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities (ETS No. 159)
Additional Protocol to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities ETS No. 159 159 Strasbourg 1995 11 09T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States signatory to the Outline Convention COEETS No. 159https://rm.coe.int/168007cdae
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (ETS No. 156)
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ETS No. 156 156 Strasbourg 1995 01 31T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member COEETS No. 156https://rm.coe.int/168007cdab
Agreement on the Transfer of Corpses (ETS No. 080)
Agreement on the Transfer of Corpses ETS No. 080 080 Strasbourg 1973 10 26T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Strasbourg 1975 11 11T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The Agreement provides for the COEETS No. 080https://rm.coe.int/168007617d
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011 Communication number s : 2052/2011 Author: Suyunbai Akmatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 Apr 2011 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2031/en-US