Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 525
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE 22070/93 N/A FRA 4/24/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 sections 19 22 25 Law no. 81 973 of 29 October 1981 Law no. 86 1025 of 9 September 1986 Law no. 89 548 of 2 August 1989 Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0424JUD002207093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57991
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM 23380/09 MARCHAND C CHIHAOUI Z. BEL 9/28/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0928JUD002338009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157670
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24839/94 N/A GBR 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58134
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF BRONIOWSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF BRONIOWSKI v. POLAND 31443/96 N/A POL 6/22/2004 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0622JUD003144396https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61828
CASE OF BROSSET-TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF BROSSET TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 34078/02 BLONDEL P. FRA 3/29/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Section 1 of the Coastal Areas Act Former Article A 26 of the State Property Code 238 354 369 62 167 509 311 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003407802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98036
CASE OF BUBBINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BUBBINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 50196/99 FISHER Christian GBR 3/17/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 as regards the State s alleged failure to protect the right to life No violation of Art. 2 as regards the effectiveness of the investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD005019699https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68548
CASE OF BUCK v. GERMANY
CASE OF BUCK v. GERMANY 41604/98 BUCK M. DEU 4/28/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0428JUD004160498https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68920
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20348/92 N/A GBR 9/25/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 sections 77 78 and 80 Circular 28 77 Department of the Environment of 25 March 1977 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0925JUD002034892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58076
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF BURLYA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 3289/10 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE UKR 11/6/2018 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD000328910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187508
CASE OF BYKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BYKOV v. RUSSIA 4378/02 KRAUSS D. PASTILLE J. C. PADVA G. RUS 3/10/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award Section 8 of the Operational Search ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD000437802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91704
CASE OF CABALLERO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CABALLERO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 32819/96 N/A GBR 2/8/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 5 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0208JUD003281996https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58458
CASE OF CAMENZIND v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF CAMENZIND v. SWITZERLAND 21353/93 N/A CHE 12/16/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 13 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002135393https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58125
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA 49429/99 N/A BGR 11/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Government s request for strike out rejected Violations of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71299
CASE OF CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CARABULEA v. ROMANIA 45661/99 EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE MACOVEI M. DAGALITA A. POPESCU N. ROU 7/13/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 substantive aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD004566199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99911
CASE OF CARDOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF CARDOT v. FRANCE 11069/84 N/A FRA 3/19/1991 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction complaint inadmissible Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 437 and 513 second paragraph 14 128 445 136 122 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001106984 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF CARDOT ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0319JUD001106984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57715
CASE OF CARLSON v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF CARLSON v. SWITZERLAND 49492/06 THE AIRE CENTRE CHE 11/6/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award 14 128 183 498 310 451 425 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD004949206 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD004949206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89410
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF CHAPMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAPMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 27238/95 GBR 1/18/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 14 Caravan Sites Act 1968 Ss. 6 10 11 12 16 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Ss. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002723895https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59154
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 25088/94 28331/95 28443/95 N/A FRA 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 14 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002508894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58288