Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3672
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
AKVARDAR v. Turkey
AKVARDAR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s inability to obtain the compensation due for expropriation of land which had belonged to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54933
ALALOGLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ALALOGLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 04/02/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 10:43:07 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54715
ANT v. Turkey
ANT v. Turkey TUR 12/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to on account of the considerable loss in value of the compensation for bodily harm as a result of high inflation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56581
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Althammer et al. v. Austria
Althammer et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/74/D/803/1998 Communication number s : 803/1998 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Austria Submission date 10 Dec 1996 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/803/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/960/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011 Communication number s : 2073/2011 Author: Liliana Assenova Naidenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Bulgaria Submission date 25 Jun 2011 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1464/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BOULTIF v. Switzerland
BOULTIF v. Switzerland CHE 02/11/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the non renewal of a foreigner s residence permit following his criminal conviction resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4702
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/02/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s prosecution for having distributed leaflets indicating that certain political candidates EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2434