Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3061 - 3078 of 3078
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/704/2015 Communication number s : 704/2015 Author: X. represented by counsel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Sep 2015 Date of decision 17 May 2018 Comment: Decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/704/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2742/en-US
YILDIRIR v. Turkey
YILDIRIR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on the ground of the authorities ordering demolition without compensation of the applicant s house purchased in good EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37152
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria
YURUKOVA AND SAMUNDZHI v. Bulgaria BGR 02/10/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in respect of the first applicant as in the restitution proceedings for recovery of property acquired EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3847
Yakovitsky et al. v. Belarus
Yakovitsky et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/128/D/2789/2016 Communication number s : 2789/2016 Author: Gennady Yakovitsky and Aleksandra Yakovitskaya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Jul 2016 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2825/en-US
Zébié v. Ivory Coast
Z bi v. Ivory Coast CCPR/C/75/D/940/2000 Communication number s : 940/2000 Author: Z bi Aka Bi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Ivory Coast Submission date 01 Aug 1997 Date of decision 09 Jul 2002 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/940/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/974/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2279/2013 Communication number s : 2279/2213 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 21 Jan 2013 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2279/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2072/en-US
Z v. Australia
Z v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/802/2017 Communication number s : 802/2017 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/802/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3368/en-US
Z. v. Croatia
Z. v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2022 00:00:00 15/12/2022 17:14:34 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life due to insufficiently reasoned judicial decisions between 2020 and 2021 dismissing the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62220
ZEMAN v. Austria
ZEMAN v. Austria AUT 29/09/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment as a result of the application of the amended Pension and Pension Allowance Act according to which widowers EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1049
ZICH AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
ZICH AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in property restoration proceedings due to the dismissal of the claim for compensation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6094
Zavrel v. Czech Republic
Zavrel v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/99/D/1615/2007 Communication number s : 1615/2007 Author: Bohuslav Zavrel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Czech Republic Submission date 12 Mar 2006 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1615/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1132/en-US
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato (UNADIS) v. Italy, Complaint No. 147/2017
decision on the merits: Unione Nazionale Dirigenti dello Stato UNADIS v. Italy Complaint No. 147/2017 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 01 04 000 04 01 000 04 04 000 05 00 000 06 04 000 24 00 163 91 00 163 2021 06 30 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-147-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-147-2017-dmerits-en
v. Algeria
v. Algeria CAT/C/52/D/402/2009 Communication number s : 402/2009 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/402/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1832/en-US
v. Netherlands
v. Netherlands CCPR/C/82/D/903/1999 Communication number s : 903/1999 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Netherlands Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/903/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1785/en-US