Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 3078
BARRILLOT v. France
BARRILLOT v. France FRA 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in particular excessive length of the pre trial investigation stage. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32553
BASU v. Germany
BASU v. Germany DEU 18/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to ascertain through an independent body that an effective investigation is carried out by the State authorities into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62530
BEYELER v. Italy
BEYELER v. Italy ITA 05/01/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the conditions under which the state exercised its pre emptive right to a painting by Van Gogh 11 years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42743
BIONDIC v. Croatia
BIONDIC v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court in civil proceedings instituted by a third party to contest an inheritance due to the rejection of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12199
BOCK AND PALADE v. Romania
BOCK AND PALADE v. Romania ROU 15/05/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the transfer of part of the applicants property to a town council pursuant to a wrongful application by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16327
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
Ben Ali v. Tunisia
Ben Ali v. Tunisia CCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012 Communication number s : 2130/2012 Author: Zine El Abidine Ben Ali Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Tunisia Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2083/en-US
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008 Communication number s : 1748/2008 Author: Josef Bergauer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 100 Country Czech Republic Submission date 05 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1553/en-US
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal,Romania
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal Romania CCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003 Communication number s : 1158/2003 Author: Aurel Blaga and Lucia Blaga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Portugal Romania Submission date 16 Jul 2002 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1242/en-US
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012 Communication number s : 2173/2012 Author: Dzhuraboy Boboev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Tajikistan Submission date 09 Jul 2012 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2311/en-US
Borzov v. Estonia
Borzov v. Estonia CCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002 Communication number s : 1136/2002 Author: Vjatseslav Borzov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Estonia Submission date 02 Nov 2001 Date of decision 26 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1136/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1129/en-US
C.M. v. Switzerland
C.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/44/D/355/2008 Communication number s : 355/2008 Author: C.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Switzerland Submission date 28 Jul 2008 Date of decision 14 May 2010 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/44/D/355/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/67/en-US
C.R. v. France
C.R. v. France FRA 23/12/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and absence of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33147
CAMBODIA: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CAMBODIA: OPSC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPSC/KHM/CO/1 NULL 2015 02 25T00:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/KHM/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 26 February 2015 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/OPSC/KHM/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/15c9421e-0090-42a1-9344-25b142a90f1c
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 14499/09 RIMSTEN E. SWE 6/28/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Extradition Conditional Yemen No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Yemen 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111553
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621