Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1445
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/7: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Kitts and Nevis
United Nations A/HRC/47/7 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/7https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc477-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-kitts-and
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece GRC 04/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22158
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
AMER v. Turkey
AMER v. Turkey TUR 06/07/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 29 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and 9 months for two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and infringement of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37140
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ARGENTINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ARGENTINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/ARG/CO/5 6 NULL 2017 05 24T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/ARG/CO/5 6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 24 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: Spanish or Punishment UHRICAT/C/ARG/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4bc7a72f-cae4-4a7d-bb8b-69edac937fcf
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep%282019%292-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Adonis v. Philippines
Adonis v. Philippines CCPR/C/103/D/1815/2008/Rev.1 Communication number s : 1815/2008 Author: Alexander Adonis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Philippines Submission date 03 Jul 2008 Date of decision 26 Oct 2011 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1815/2008/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1613/en-US
Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev v. Azerbaijan
Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/112/D/1972/2010 Communication number s : 1972/2010 Author: Ali Djahangir oglu Quliyev represented by counsel Eldar Zeynalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Azerbaijan Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1972/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1892/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to marry: Prohibition of marriage between a father in law and daughter in law by legislation unless both their former spouses had die. Article 12 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2850
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105