Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2000
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.B.A. et al. v. Spain
A.B.A. et al. v. Spain CRC/C/91/D/114/2020 CRC/C/91/D/116/2020 Communication number s : 116/2020 117/2020 118/2020 114/2020 Author: A.B.A. and F.Z.A. F.E.M. and S.E.M. S.E.Y. and M.E.Y. and N.L. R.A. and M.A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session JUTBCRC/C/91/D/114/2020, CRC/C/91/D/116/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3715/en-US
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Abichou v. Germany
Abichou v. Germany CAT/C/50/D/430/2010 Communication number s : 430/2010 Author: Inass Abichou n e Seifeddine Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Germany Submission date 25 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/50/D/430/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/9/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Ahmed Zerrougui v. Algeria
Ahmed Zerrougui v. Algeria CCPR/C/108/D/1796/2008 Communication number s : 1796/2008 Author: Ahmed Zerrougui Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Algeria Submission date 18 Jun 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2013 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/1796/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1795/en-US
Al-Rabassi v. Libya
Al Rabassi v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009 Communication number s : 1860/2009 Author: Mufteh Younis Muftah Al Rabassi represented by human rights organization Alkarama Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 16 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1840/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Aouali, Faraoun and Bouregba v. Algeria
Aouali Faraoun and Bouregba v. Algeria CCPR/C/109/D/1884/2009 Communication number s : 1884/2009 Author: Mouni Aouali Feryale Faraoun and Fatiha Bouregba Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1884/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1687/en-US
Armenia must bridge gaps in legislation, tackle hate speech and violence, says Council of Europe’s Anti-racism Commission
Armenia must bridge gaps in legislation tackle hate speech and violence says Council of Europe s Anti racism Commission ARM 2016 10 04 Fourth report on Armenia en fr arm Press Release 04.10.2016 Armenian version Armenia must bridge gaps in legislation ECRIARM-PR-V-2016-224-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ARM-PR-V-2016-224-ENG
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 NULL 2019 12 06T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 International Covenant on Distr.: General 6 December 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BEL/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/943606ba-aac7-4b1e-9f9b-ec5c020ce60b
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BEN/CO/3 NULL 2020 03 27T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BEN/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 27 March 2020 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BEN/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b68e7215-1425-47f7-8e10-d635cfd970d2