Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1112
10. International Convention against Apartheid in Sports
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 10. International Convention against Apartheid in Sports New York 10 December 1985 Entry into force : 3 April 1988 in accordance with article 18 1 . Registration : 3 April 1988 No. 25822 UNIV-10https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-10&chapter=4&clang=_en
15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 15. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities New York 13 December 2006 Entry into force : 3 May 2008 in accordance with article 45 1 . Registration : 3 May 2008 No. 44910 Status : UNIV-15https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Anderson v. Australia
Anderson v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005 Communication number s : 1367/2005 Author: Tim Anderson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1306/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Aster v. Czech Republic
Aster v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007 Communication number s : 1575/2007 Author: Herman Aster Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Feb 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1478/en-US
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to consider the merits of the applicants claims and appeals due to a restrictive interpretation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6072
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal,Romania
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal Romania CCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003 Communication number s : 1158/2003 Author: Aurel Blaga and Lucia Blaga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Portugal Romania Submission date 16 Jul 2002 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1242/en-US
Blazek et al. v. Czech Republic
Blazek et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/72/D/857/1999 Communication number s : 857/1999 Author: Miroslav Blazek George A. Hartman and George Krizek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Oct 1997 Date JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/857/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/927/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND
CASE OF A AND OTHERS v. ICELAND 25133/20 31856/20 SGEIRSSON J. J NSD TTIR .I. ISL 11/15/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1115JUD002513320https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-220885
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 57864/17 79087/17 55353/19 BAKHTADZE K. LEACH P. REMEZAITE R. GAVRON J. SAWYER J. CLIFFORD J. JOMARJIDZE N. ONIANI T. TABATADZE G. COJOCARIU C. LEVINE K. EVANS J. GEO 12/1/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005786417https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221237
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 22681/09 YILMAZ A. YILMAZ S.N. TUR 7/22/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0722JUD002268109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145708
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA 53891/20 DOBREVA N. BGR 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224778
CASE OF A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA
CASE OF A.K. AND L. v. CROATIA 37956/11 KUSAN L. HRV 1/8/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non pecuniary damage award Sections 114 4 5 and 6 and 267 of the Family Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD003795611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115868