Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1878
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.S. and L.S. v. Australia
A.S. and L.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/47/D/490/1992 Communication number s : 490/1992 Author: A.S. and L.S. names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 47 Country Australia Submission date 26 Dec 1991 Date of decision 30 Mar 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/47/D/490/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/498/en-US
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/DZA/CO/2 NULL 2018 05 25T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/DZA/CO/2 International Convention on the Distr.: General 25 May 2018 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French Members of UHRICMW/C/DZA/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bdb784ca-7a7f-41ef-ab71-0d121b979f7f
ALI DEMIR v. Turkey
ALI DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 12/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to property on account of the fact that the domestic authorities failed to compensate the applicant for the part of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51503
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
APARICIO NAVARRO REVERTER AND GARCIA SAN MIGUEL Y ORUETA v. Spain
APARICIO NAVARRO REVERTER AND GARCIA SAN MIGUEL Y ORUETA v. Spain ESP 10/04/2017 00:00:00 02/06/2017 09:05:24 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing before administrative courts due to the failure to notify the applicant owners EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46905
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
AZAS v. Greece
AZAS v. Greece GRC 21/05/2003 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Several procedural shortcomings or relating to compensation in the context of land expropriation proceedings. Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22222
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/AZE/CO/4 NULL 2021 11 02T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/AZE/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 2 November 2021 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/AZE/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/70fcaf4b-f336-4518-9d1b-9db47dc63e10
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 01/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the demolition of the applicant company s construction work on an expropriated site EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37158
BURGHELEA v. Romania
BURGHELEA v. Romania ROU 27/04/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Illegal land acquisition of land by authorities without agreement on the terms or compensation as part of a hydroelectric power station construction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16607
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332