Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 427
3. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 3. International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 3 January 1976 in accordance with article 27. 1 Registration : 3 January 1976 No. UNIV-3https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-3&chapter=4&clang=_en
ADAMICEK v. the Czech Republic
ADAMICEK v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to the Constitutional Court due to the lack of clear rules concerning the formalities and time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6182
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
Addendum To The Second Compliance Report Lithuania
Addendum To The Second Compliance Report Lithuania LTU 2021 03 25 2021 05 06 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Lithuania to implement the recommendations issued in the Fourth GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)2-Final-eng-Lithuania-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%292-Final-eng-Lithuania-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (ETS No. 156)
Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ETS No. 156 156 Strasbourg 1995 01 31T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member COEETS No. 156https://rm.coe.int/168007cdab
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
BELES AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to consider the merits of the applicants claims and appeals due to a restrictive interpretation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6072
BERANEK v. the Czech Republic
BERANEK v. the Czech Republic CZE 05/10/2017 00:00:00 09/10/2017 10:54:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to erroneous dismissal of the applicant s constitutional appeal following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47887
BORANKOVA v. the Czech Republic
BORANKOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 21/05/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before civil administrative and criminal courts and in certain cases lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6066
BULENA v. the Czech Republic
BULENA v. the Czech Republic CZE 20/07/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to the Constitutional Court due to its excessively formal interpretation of the admissibility rules. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6120
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016 Communication number s : 2773/2016 Author: Bholi Pharaka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 May 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2779/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.L. v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF A.L. v. AUSTRIA 7788/11 ROSENKRANZ B. AUT 5/10/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Togo 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD000778811 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A.L. v. AUSTRIA Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0510JUD000778811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110803
CASE OF A.-M.V. v. FINLAND
CASE OF A. M.V. v. FINLAND 53251/13 SILLANPAA H. FIN 3/23/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0323JUD005325113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172134
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF ALİ RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AL RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 30226/10 5506/16 BEZEN S. VALLONI L. SOYDAN A. EDEBALI Z. TUR 1/28/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6 1 Civil rights and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD003022610https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200548