Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2648
ASDAC v. the Republic of Moldova
ASDAC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/03/2021 00:00:00 24/03/2021 16:28:16 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the National Bank of Moldova s use on new coins of artworks created by two members of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57043
ASSOCIATION RHINO AND OTHERS v. Switzerland
ASSOCIATION RHINO AND OTHERS v. Switzerland CHE 08/03/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Freedom of association: Disproportionate interference resulting in the dissolution of a squatters association as pursuing an illegal aim by final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4760
Adonis v. Philippines
Adonis v. Philippines CCPR/C/103/D/1815/2008/Rev.1 Communication number s : 1815/2008 Author: Alexander Adonis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Philippines Submission date 03 Jul 2008 Date of decision 26 Oct 2011 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1815/2008/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1613/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Althammer et al. (2) v. Austria
Althammer et al. 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/78/D/998/2001 Communication number s : 998/2001 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Austria Submission date 22 Apr 1998 Date of decision 08 Aug 2003 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/998/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1054/en-US
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BITTO AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 28/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to unjust limitations on the use of property by landlords in particular through the rent control scheme. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7709
BJEDOV v. Croatia
BJEDOV v. Croatia HRV 29/08/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference on account of the domestic courts decisions ordering the applicants to leave State owned flats failing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12035
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BOCK AND PALADE v. Romania
BOCK AND PALADE v. Romania ROU 15/05/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the transfer of part of the applicants property to a town council pursuant to a wrongful application by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16327
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
CALDARELLA v. Italy
CALDARELLA v. Italy ITA 22/01/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with private life: due to the application of limitations to the applicant s personal capacity deriving from his being registered as bankrupt EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43275
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND 56925/08 PONCET C. CHE 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 235 326 579 379 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.B. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145457
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28680/06 MOLE N. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 8 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage award Section 23 6 of the Children Act 1989 238 354 444 110 451 268 376 425 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97636