Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 887
A.A.S. v. Denmark
A.A.S. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2464/2014 Communication number s : 2464/2014 Author: A.A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Oct 2014 Date of decision 04 Jul 2016 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2464/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2224/en-US
A.A. v. Sweden
A.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/72/D/918/2019 Communication number s : 918/2019 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Feb 2019 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/72/D/918/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3078/en-US
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/130/D/2757/2016 Communication number s : 2757/2016 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2016 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2757/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3273/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/130/D/2727/2016 Communication number s : 2727/2016 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Nov 2014 Date of decision 16 Oct 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2727/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3297/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia
Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015 Communication number s : 2537/2015 Author: Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 11 Aug 2014 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2501/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BRAZIL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BRAZIL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/BRA/CO/18 20 NULL 2022 12 07T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/BRA/CO/18 20 International Convention on Distr.: General 19 December 2022 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/BRA/CO/18-20https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9955cd8a-1e66-4dd6-a2b6-7aac5a0d1d93
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan
Bakhytzhan Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2503/2014 Communication number s : 2503/2014 Author: Bakhytzhan Toregozhina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 13 Jun 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2503/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2857/en-US
Bibaud v. Canada
Bibaud v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008 Communication number s : 1747/2008 Author: Mireille Boisvert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 23 Jul 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1577/en-US
Bodrozic v. Serbia,Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)
Bodrozic v. Serbia Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Serbia and Montenegro CCPR/C/85/D/1180/2003 Communication number s : 1180/2003 Author: Zeljko Bodrozic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Serbia Federal Republic of Yugoslavia JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1180/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1180/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.B. v. SWITZERLAND 56925/08 PONCET C. CHE 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 265 235 326 579 379 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508 SECOND SECTION CASE OF A.B. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145457