Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1067
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%293-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A.C. v. France
A.C. v. France FRA 10/08/1995 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court of appeal which had sentenced the applicant in absentia and where his lawyer was not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31433
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.T. v. Luxembourg
A.T. v. Luxembourg LUX 14/09/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of assistance by a lawyer during police hearing and lack of communication between the applicant and his lawyer before the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-165
AKSOY v. Turkey
AKSOY v. Turkey TUR 18/12/1996 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Action of security forces: Right to life protection against ill treatment protection of property lack of an effective remedy: Against the background of the fight against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37124
ANDREYEV v. Estonia
ANDREYEV v. Estonia EST 22/02/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Deprivation of the right to appeal in criminal proceedings as the applicant s legal aid lawyer had failed to lodge an appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3095
ARMENIA: REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE
ARMENIA: REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE CAT/OP/ARM/2 NULL 2017 02 22T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/ARM/2 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 22 February 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English English French Russian UHRICAT/OP/ARM/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/cd1a2951-d987-47c5-9623-51169c4ce79b
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AUS/CO/6 NULL 2022 12 05T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AUS/CO/6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 5 December 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/AUS/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/43210655-30d4-4aeb-9552-debfec1cc4ab
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/AZE/CO/5 6 NULL 2023 02 10T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/AZE/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 22 February 2023 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/AZE/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c2cad531-104b-4cef-a805-750c234f2041
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia CRPD/C/20/D/38/2016 Communication number s : 038/2016 Author: Al Adam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Saudi Arabia Submission date 05 May 2016 Date of decision 20 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/38/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2513/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BENIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BEN/CO/3 NULL 2019 06 04T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BEN/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 4 June 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: French or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BEN/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1e695a9f-c808-444b-bdbe-3ae8b3659b80
BEUZE v. Belgium
BEUZE v. Belgium BEL 09/11/2018 00:00:00 16/11/2018 14:46:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings as a whole due to the fact that procedural defects which had occurred at pre trial stage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50769
BORG v. Malta
BORG v. Malta MLT 12/04/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings a lack of legal assistance during the applicant s questioning in police custody. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3191
BORISOVA v. Bulgaria
BORISOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in the context of proceedings under the Decree on Combating Minor Hooliganism as a result of which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14709
BOROTYUK v. Ukraine
BOROTYUK v. Ukraine UKR 16/03/2011 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Unfair proceedings resulting in convictions on the basis of self incriminating EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25337
BRENNAN v. the United Kingdom
BRENNAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of a suspect s defence rights due to the presence of a police officer during the first consultation with his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2596
BRUSCO v. France
BRUSCO v. France FRA 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the obligation to swear an oath to tell the truth during placement in custody as a witness EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33061