Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2541 - 2555 of 2555
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.2 from 4 April 2009 to 9 April 2009 14 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Afghanistan United Nations UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/10/14/Add.2 from 26 May 2008 to 30 May 2008 19 February 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United Kingdom of Great UNSPA/HRC/10/14/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f10%2f14%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Lithuania
X v. Lithuania CCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015 Communication number s : 2564/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Aug 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2564/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3318/en-US
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 16/10/2018 15:10:36 Case Description: This group of cases concerns interferences with the applicants right to respect for their home or their private and family life as a result of eviction or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1924
Z.A.H. v. Canada
Z.A.H. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/687/2015 Communication number s : 687/2015 Author: Z.A.H. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jun 2015 Date of decision 11 Aug JUTBCAT/C/61/D/687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2284/en-US
Z.H. v. Canada
Z.H. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 Communication number s : 604/2014 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 18 May 2014 Date of decision 20 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/604/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2071/en-US
ZAMBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ZAMBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/ZMB/CO/17 19 NULL 2019 06 03T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/ZMB/CO/17 19 International Convention on Distr.: General 3 June 2019 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English Committee UHRICERD/C/ZMB/CO/17-19https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e28a40bf-e946-4b2c-8108-9588846b0ceb
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14078
Ziablitsev v. France
Ziablitsev v. France E/C.12/71/D/176/2020 Communication number s : 176/2020 Author: Sergei Ziablitsev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country France Submission date 06 Jan 2020 Date of decision 02 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/71/D/176/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3000/en-US
c("Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )", "Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )")
c Document/information Follow up Information c A/HRC/36/61 A/HRC/36/61 c c 27 July 2017 27 July 2017 c Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia Cambodia third official country visit Special Rapporteur on the situation of human UNSPc("A/HRC/36/61", "A/HRC/36/61")https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f61&Lang=en
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC