Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 8493
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland
A.B. and B.D. v. Poland CCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017 Communication number s : 3017/2017 Author: A.B. and B.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Poland Submission date 24 Aug 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3017/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3673/en-US
A.B. v. Slovakia
A.B. v. Slovakia SVK 04/06/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to present one s case on equal terms with the defendant in that without a formal and reasoned decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7855
A.D. v. Cyprus
A.D. v. Cyprus CAT/C/75/D/1065/2021 Communication number s : 1065/2021 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cyprus Submission date 18 Mar 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1065/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3610/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A.S. v. Poland
A.S. v. Poland POL 23/10/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention on remand under a bill of indictment and its prolongation on the basis of a fax from the Supreme Court lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17841
A.T. v. Estonia
A.T. v. Estonia EST 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Interference due to dismissal without examination of the detained applicant s complaints concerning the circumstances of his visit to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51535
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey TUR 01/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Right to liberty and security / deportation and extradition protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: absence of clear legal provisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37254
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece GRC 04/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22158
ADEM ARSLAN v. Turkey
ADEM ARSLAN v. Turkey TUR 19/03/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the failure to hold hearings in cases in which small fines were adopted by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5556
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania ROU 12/07/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings which ended with the applicant s conviction to a suspended prison sentence for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16525
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia ARM 05/04/2018 00:00:00 18/04/2018 09:59:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49313
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AGROMODEL OOD AND MIRONOV v. Bulgaria
AGROMODEL OOD AND MIRONOV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicant company s right of access to court from 1997 to 2005 because of the domestic courts refusal to examine its claim for damages on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3803
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine UKR 30/11/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty as well as of right to property on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26152