Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2636
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia MKD 26/09/2019 00:00:00 03/10/2019 11:22:51 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of confiscation of his vehicle within the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52869
ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. Greece
ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. Greece GRC 21/05/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Interference with the company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions: failure of the Supreme Administrative Council to take EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22352
ANTONYAN v. Armenia
ANTONYAN v. Armenia ARM 02/01/2013 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Unlawful interference with the right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Authorities required flat owner to pay compensation in order to terminate an alleged right of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-425
Achabal Puertas v. Spain
Achabal Puertas v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010 Communication number s : 1945/2010 Author: Mar a Cruz Achabal Puertas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 02 Nov 2009 Date of decision 27 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1945/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1317/en-US
Agabekova v. Uzbekistan
Agabekova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/89/D/1071/2002 Communication number s : 1071/2002 Author: Nadezhda Agabekova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 11 Apr 2002 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1071/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1340/en-US
Aliyev et al. v. Azerbaijan
Aliyev et al. v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2805/2016 Communication number s : 2805/2016 Author: Aziz Aliyev Jeyhun Aliyev Vagif Aliyev Gamar Aliyeva Havva Aliyeva and Yevdokiya Sobko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2805/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3199/en-US
BIONDIC v. Croatia
BIONDIC v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court in civil proceedings instituted by a third party to contest an inheritance due to the rejection of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12199
BORZHONOV v. Russia
BORZHONOV v. Russia RUS 22/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to respect the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retention of their property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13819
BREZOVEC v. Croatia
BREZOVEC v. Croatia HRV 29/06/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Refusal by authorities in contravention to previously established case law of the Constitutional Court to let the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12467
BUFFALO SRL IN LIQUIDAZIONE v. Italy
BUFFALO SRL IN LIQUIDAZIONE v. Italy ITA 03/10/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:25:05 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions on account of the authorities delay in paying back to the applicant company in liquidation since 1994 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45034
BURSAC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BURSAC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 28/07/2022 00:00:00 19/08/2022 09:42:37 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicants right to a peaceful enjoyment of possessions in that the domestic courts ordered the applicants to bear the full EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60969
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008 Communication number s : 1748/2008 Author: Josef Bergauer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 100 Country Czech Republic Submission date 05 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1553/en-US
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic
Brok and Brokova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/774/1997 Communication number s : 774/1997 Author: Robert Brok deceased and his surviving spouse Dagmar Brokova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 23 Dec JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/774/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/947/en-US
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO 37571/05 RADULOVIC P. MNE 3/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116972
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A.G. v. ITALY
CASE OF A.G. v. ITALY 66441/01 ITA 10/9/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009JUD006644101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61343
CASE OF AĆIMOVIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF A IMOVI v. CROATIA 61237/00 N/A HRV 10/9/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage financial award 1999 Act on Amending the Civil Obligations Act Section 184 a 2003 Act on the liability of the Republic of Croatia for damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009JUD006123700https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61344