You are here:

Artículo 47 - Derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva y a un juez imparcial

Artículo 47 - Derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva y a un juez imparcial

Toda persona cuyos derechos y libertades garantizados por el Derecho de la Unión hayan sido violados tiene derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva respetando las condiciones establecidas en el presente artículo. Toda persona tiene derecho a que su causa sea oída equitativa y públicamente y dentro de un plazo razonable por un juez independiente e imparcial, establecido previamente por la ley. Toda persona podrá hacerse aconsejar, defender y representar. Se prestará asistencia jurídica gratuita a quienes no dispongan de recursos suficientes siempre y cuando dicha asistencia sea necesaria para garantizar la efectividad del acceso a la justicia.

  • Bulgaria / Appellate Court / 175/2020
    Mr N.D.I vs the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Bulgaria
    Decision date:
    20 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Appellate Court
    Type:
    Decision
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:BG:AP200:2020:20200600175.001
  • CJEU C-771/18 / Judgment
    European Commission v Hungary
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Ninth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Energy
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:584
  • CJEU Case 133/19 / Judgment
    B. M. M. and Others v État belge
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Third Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:577
  • CJEU Case C-183/20 P / Order
    Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed)
    Type:
    Decision
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:562
  • CJEU Case C-311/13 / Judgment
    Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Information society
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:559
  • CJEU Case C-378/16 P / Judgment
    Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Third Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Economic and monetary affairs
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:575
  • CJEU Case C-658/18 / Judgment
    UX v Governo della Repubblica italiana
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Second Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Employment and social policy
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:572
  • Romania / Constitutional Court / 2.493/271/2016
    Constitutional referral raised by Alexandru Maghiar before the Romanian High Court of Cassation (Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție)
    Decision date:
    16 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Romanian Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
  • CJEU Case C-264/19 / Judgment
    Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC and Google Inc
    Decision date:
    09 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Fifht Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Information society
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:542
  • CJEU Case C-272/19 / Judgment
    VQ v Land Hessen
    Decision date:
    09 Jul 2020
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court IThird Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Information society
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:535

61 results found

  • The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

    URL:
    The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
    Country:
    Austria

    Article 6 1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence; c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.

0 results found

5 results found

0 results found