eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Airteagal 49 - Prionsabail na dlíthiúlachta agus na comhréireachta i dtaca le cionta coiriúla agus pionóis

Airteagal 49 - Prionsabail na dlíthiúlachta agus na comhréireachta i dtaca le cionta coiriúla agus pionóis

1. Ní bhfaighfear aon duine ciontach in aon chion coiriúil i ngeall ar aon ghníomh nó neamhghníomh nár chion coiriúil é faoin dlí náisiúnta nó faoin dlí idirnáisiúnta tráth a dhéanta. Ná ní ghearrfar pionós is troime ná mar dob inghearrtha an tráth a rinneadh an cion coiriúil. Más rud é, tar éis an cion coiriúil a dhéanamh, go bhforáiltear do phionós níos éadroime sa dlí, beidh an pionós sin infheidhme. 2. Beidh an tAirteagal seo gan dochar do thriail agus do phionósú aon duine i ngeall ar aon ghníomh nó neamhghníomh a bhí, tráth a dhéanta, coiriúil de réir na bprionsabal ginearálta atá aitheanta ag pobal na náisiún. 3. Ní ceadmhach déine na bpionós a bheith neamhchomhréireach leis an gcion coiriúil..

  • Text:

    Leanann an tAirteagal seo an riail thraidisiúnta maidir le neamh-aisghníomhaíocht dlíthe agus smachtbhannaí coiriúla. Cuireadh leis seo an riail maidir le haisghníomhaíocht dlí choiriúil níba thrócairí, atá ann i roinnt Ballstát agus atá le fáil in Airteagal 15 den Chúnant maidir le Cearta Sibhialta agus Polaitiúla.

    Is mar a leanas atá an fhoclaíocht in Airteagal 7 den CECD:

    `1. Ní mheasfar aon duine a bheith ciontach in aon chion coiriúil i ngeall ar aon ghníomh nó neamhghníomh nár chion coiriúil faoin dlí náisiúnta nó idirnáisiúnta an tráth a rinneadh é. Ná ní ghearrfar pionós is troime ná mar dob inghearrtha an tráth a rinneadh an cion coiriúil.

    2. Ní dhéanfaidh an tAirteagal seo dochar do thriail agus pionósú aon duine in aon ghníomh nó neamhghníomh ba chion coiriúil tráth a dhéanta do réir na bprionsabal ginearálta dlí a aithníos náisiúin shibhialta.`

    I mír 2, scriosadh an tagairt do náisiúin `shibhialta`, ní athraíonn sé seo an bhrí atá leis an mír, ina dtagraítear ach go háirithe do chionta in aghaidh na daonnachta. I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 52(3), is ionann brí agus raon feidhme atá don cheart a ráthaítear anseo agus don cheart a ráthaítear sa CECD.

    I mír 3 luaitear prionsabal ginearálta na comhréire idir pionóis agus cionta coiriúla, prionsabal atá cumhdaithe i gcomhthraidisiúin bhunreachtúla na mBallstát agus i gcásdlí Chúirt Bhreithiúnais na gComhphobal Eorpach.

    Source:
    Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
  • Nicola Micallef vs Avukat Ġenerali
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    First Hall of the Civil Court (Constitutional Jurisdiction)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:MT:KOST:2021:126039
  • Criminal proceedings against K. M.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Sixth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Maritime Affairs And Fisheries
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2021:112
  • Pirelli & C. SpA v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Seventh Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Competition
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:868
  • Appellants: Telšiai district court and Vilnius city district court
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Joseph Zammit vs Commissioner of Police and Attorney General
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    First Hall, Civil Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Criminal proceedings against JI
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (First Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:455
  • Luxaviation SA v Ministre de l'Environnement
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Sixth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Environment
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:228
  • „МАК ТURS“ AD v Direktor na Direktsia „Inspektsia po truda“ - Blagoevgrad
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Sixth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    External relations
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:99
  • Several Italian Surveillance Courts (Tribunale di Sorveglianza), Judges of Preliminary Investigations and Ordinary Courts
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Criminal proceedings against A. P
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:80

52 results found

  • Eesti Vabariigi Põhiseadus
    Tír:
    Estonia

    § 23. Kedagi ei tohi süüdi mõista teo eest, kui seda tegu ei tunnista kuriteoks seadus, mis oli jõus teo toimepanemise ajal. Kellelegi ei tohi mõista raskemat karistust kui see, mida võinuks talle mõista õiguserikkumise toimepanemise ajal. Kui seadus sätestab pärast õiguserikkumise toimepanemist kergema karistuse, kohaldatakse kergemat karistust. Kedagi ei tohi teist korda kohtu alla anda ega karistada teo eest, milles teda vastavalt seadusele on mõistetud lõplikult süüdi või õigeks.
    § 24. Kedagi ei tohi tema vaba tahte vastaselt üle viia seadusega määratud kohtu alluvusest teise kohtu alluvusse.Igaühel on õigus olla oma kohtuasja arutamise juures. Kohtuistungid on avalikud. Kohus võib seaduses sätestatud juhtudel ja korras oma istungi või osa sellest kuulutada kinniseks riigi- või ärisaladuse, kõlbluse või inimeste perekonna- ja eraelu kaitseks või kui seda nõuavad alaealise, kannatanu või õigusemõistmise huvid.Kohtuotsus kuulutatakse avalikult, välja arvatud juhud, kui alaealise, abielupoole või kannatanu huvid nõuavad teisiti.Igaühel on õigus tema kohta tehtud kohtuotsuse peale seadusega sätestatud korras edasi kaevata kõrgemalseisvale kohtule. 

  • The Constitution of the Republic of Cyprus
    Tír:
    Cyprus

    Article 12
    1. No person shall be held guilty of any offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute an offence under the law at the time when it was committed; and no person shall have a heavier punishment imposed on him for an offence other than that expressly provided for it by law at the time when it was committed.

    3. No law shall provide for a punishment which is disproportionate to the gravity of the offence.

  • Tο Σύνταγμα της Κυπριακής Δημοκρατίας
    Tír:
    Cyprus

    ΑΡΘΡΟΝ 12
    1. Ουδείς κηρύσσεται ένοχος οιουδήποτε αδικήματος λόγω πράξεως ή παραλείψεως μη συνιστώσης αδίκημα συμφώνως τω νόμω τω ισχύοντι κατά τον χρόνον της τελέσεως αυτής και εις ουδένα επιβάλλεται δι’ αδίκημά τι ποινή βαρυτέρα της ρητώς προβλεπομένης υπό του κατά τον χρόνον της τελέσεως ισχύοντος νόμου.

    3. Ο νόμος δεν δύναται να προβλέψη ποινήν δυσανάλογον προς την βαρύτητα του αδικήματος.

  • Constitution of the Republic of Croatia
    Tír:
    Croatia

    Article 16
    Freedoms and rights may only be curtailed by law in order to protect the freedoms and rights of others, the legal order, and public morals and health.
    Any restriction of freedoms or rights shall be proportionate to the nature of the need to do so in each individual case.

    Article 30
    The sentence for a severe and particularly ignominious criminal offence may, in compliance with law, have as a consequence the loss of acquired rights or a ban on exercising, for a set period, certain rights pertaining to the conduct of specific affairs, if this is required to safeguard the legal order.

    Article 31
    (1)No one may be punished for an act which, prior to its commission, was not defined as a punishable offence by domestic or international law, nor may such individual be sentenced to
    a penalty which was not then defined by law. If a less severe penalty is determined by law after the commission of said act, such penalty shall be imposed.

  • Ustav Republike Hrvatske
    Tír:
    Croatia

    Članak 16.
    Slobode i prava mogu se ograničiti samo zakonom da bi se zaštitila sloboda i prava drugih ljudi te pravni poredak, javni moral i zdravlje.
    Svako ograničenje slobode ili prava mora biti razmjerno naravi potrebe za ograničenjem u svakom pojedinom slučaju.

    Članak 30.
    Kaznena osuda za teška i osobito nečasna kaznena djela može, u skladu sa zakonom, imati za posljedicu gubitak stečenih ili zabranu stjecanja na određeno vrijeme nekih prava na obavljanje određenih poslova, ako to zahtijeva zaštita pravnog poretka.

    Članak 31.
    (1)Nitko ne može biti kažnjen za djelo koje prije nego je počinjeno nije bilo utvrđeno zakonom ili međunarodnim pravom kao kazneno djelo, niti mu se može izreći kazna koja nije bila određena zakonom. Ako zakon nakon počinjenog djela odredi blažu kaznu, odredit će se takva kazna.

  • Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria
    Tír:
    Bulgaria

    Art. 5(3) No one shall be convicted for action or inaction which at the time it was committed, did not constitute a crime. Art. 31 [...] (7) There shall be no limitation to the prosecution and the execution of a sentence for crimes against peace and humanity.

  • КОНСТИТУЦИЯ на Република България
    Tír:
    Bulgaria

    Чл. 5(3) Никой не може да бъде осъден за действие или бездействие, което не е било обявено от закона за престъпление към момента на извършването му. Чл. 31 [...] (7) Не се погасяват по давност наказателното преследване и изпълнението на наказанието за престъпления против мира и човечеството.

  • De Belgische Grondwet
    Tír:
    Belgium

    Artikel 14Geen straf kan worden ingevoerd of toegepast dan krachtens de wet. Artikel 17De straf van verbeurdverklaring der goederen kan niet worden ingevoerd.

  • La Constitution Belge
    Tír:
    Belgium

    Article 14Nulle peine ne peut être établie ni appliquée qu'en vertu de la loi. Article 17La peine de la confiscation des biens ne peut être établie.

  • The Belgian Constitution
    Tír:
    Belgium

    Article 14.No punishment can be introduced or administered except by virtue of the law. Article 17.Assets may not be confiscated as a means of punishment.

  • European Convention on Human Rights - Article 7
    Tír:
    Austria

    Artikel 7

    1. No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.

    2. This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.

  • Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten
    Tír:
    Austria

    Artikel 7 (1) Niemand kann wegen einer Handlung oder Unterlassung verurteilt werden, die zur Zeit ihrer Begehung nach inländischem oder internationalem Recht nicht strafbar war. Ebenso darf keine höhere Strafe als die im Zeitpunkt der Begehung der strafbaren Handlung angedrohte Strafe verhängt werden. (2) Durch diesen Artikel darf die Verurteilung oder Bestrafung einer Person nicht ausgeschlossen werden, die sich einer Handlung oder Unterlassung schuldig gemacht hat, welche im Zeitpunkt ihrer Begehung nach den von den zivilisierten Völkern allgemein anerkannten Rechtsgrundsätzen strafbar war.

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found