eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Airteagal 7 - Meas ar an saol príobháideach agus ar shaol an teaghlaigh

Airteagal 7 - Meas ar an saol príobháideach agus ar shaol an teaghlaigh

Tá ag gach duine an ceart go ndéanfar a shaol nó a saol príobháideach agus a shaol nó a saol teaghlaigh, a chónaí nó a cónaí agus a chumarsáidí nó a cumarsáidí a urramú.

    • Text:

      Freagraíonn na cearta a ráthaítear in Airteagal 7 do na cearta a ráthaítear in Airteagal 8 den CECD. Chun forbairtí sa teicneolaíocht a chur san áireamh, tá an focal `cumarsáid` curtha isteach in ionad an fhocail `comhfhreagras`.
      I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 52(3) is ionann brí agus raon feidhme dó agus don Airteagal comhfhreagrach sa CECD. Dá dheasca sin, is ionann na teorainneacha a fhéadfar a fhorchur go dlisteanach leis an gceart seo agus na teorainneacha a cheadaítear le hAirteagal 8 den CECD:
      `1. Tá ag gach uile dhuine an ceart chun go mba slán dó a shaol príobháideach agus saol a theaghlaigh, a ionad cónaithe agus a chomhfhreagras.
      2. Ní chuirfidh aon údarás poiblí isteach ar fheidhmiú an chirt seo, ach sa mhéid go mbeidh sin de réir an dlí agus riachtanach i ndaonlathas ar mhaithe leis an tslándáil náisiúnta, le sábháilteacht an phobail nó le leas eacnamaíoch na tíre, chun anord nó coiriúlacht a chosc, chun sláinte nó moráltacht a chosaint nó chun cearta agus saoirsí daoine eile a chosaint.`

      Source:
      Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
    • Public Prosecutor’s Office of Bolzano and D.G.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Mr. … and Mrs …. v. Direct Tax Department (anonymised judgment)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Administrative Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Privacy International v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Information society
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:790
    • État luxembourgeois v B and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Taxation
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:795
    • La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Information society
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:791
    • Order of Francophone and Germanophone Bars, Order of Flemish Bars and the Institute of Accountants and Tax Consultants and others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • The Prosecution Service v. T
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Supreme Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Information society
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:559
    • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Second Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:571
    • Plaintiff: Ž.B. Respondent/interested party: Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration Authority issuing the opinion in the case: The State Commission of the Lithuanian Language
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Vilnius city district court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found