eu-charter

Charta základných práv Európskej únie

Článok 48 - Prezumpcia neviny a právo na obhajobu

Článok 48 - Prezumpcia neviny a právo na obhajobu

1. Každý, kto je obvinený, sa považuje za nevinného, kým jeho vina nebola preukázaná zákonným spôsobom. 2. Každý, kto je obvinený, má zaručené právo na obhajobu.

  • Text:

    Článok 48 je rovnaký ako článok 6 ods. 2 a 3 EDĽP, ktorý znie:

    `2. Každý, kto je obvinený z trestného činu, sa považuje za nevinného, dokiaľ jeho vina nebola preukázaná zákonným spôsobom.

     3. Každý, kto je obvinený z trestného činu, má tieto minimálne práva:

    a) byť bez meškania a v jazyku, ktorému rozumie, podrobne oboznámený s povahou a dôvodom obvinenia proti nemu;

    b) mať primeraný čas a možnosti na prípravu svojej obhajoby;

    c) obhajovať sa osobne alebo s pomocou obhajcu podľa vlastného výberu, alebo pokiaľ nemá prostriedky na zaplatenie obhajcu, aby sa mu poskytol bezplatne, ak to záujmy spravodlivosti vyžadujú;

    d) vyslúchať alebo dať vyslúchať svedkov proti sebe a dosiahnuť predvolanie a výsluch svedkov vo svoj prospech za rovnakých podmienok, ako svedkov proti sebe;

    e) mať bezplatnú pomoc tlmočníka, ak nerozumie jazyku používanému pred súdom alebo týmto jazykom nehovorí.`

    V súlade s článkom 52 ods. 3 charty má toto právo rovnaký význam a rozsah pôsobnosti ako právo zaručené EDĽP.

    Source:
    Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Ďalej uvedené vysvetlivky boli pôvodne pripravené pod vedením predsedníctva konventu, ktorý vypracoval návrh Charty základných práv Európskej únie. Boli aktualizované pod vedením predsedníctva Európskeho konventu so zreteľom na úpravy, ktoré urobil tento konvent k textu charty (najmä k článkom 51 a 52), a vývoj práva Únie. Hoci tieto vysvetlivky nie sú ako také právne záväzné, predstavujú cenný nástroj výkladu, ktorý je určený na objasnenie ustanovení charty.
  • Criminal proceedings against IS
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2021:292
  • Beneficiary of funding by the European Structural and Investment Funds – Regional Operational Programme for the South Aegean (2000-2006) vs. Greek State (Ministry of Finance)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Court of Auditors
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Pometon SpA v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Fourth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Economic and monetary affairs
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2021:214
  • KG vs. The Prosecutor General
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • JR
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (First Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2021:206
  • DB v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2021:84
  • Appellant v State Secretary of Justice and Security
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Council of State
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:NL:RVS:2021:114
  • TR v Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamburg
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Fourth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:1042
  • Criminal proceedings against VW
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2019:940
  • Pirelli & C. SpA v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Seventh Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Competition
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:868

43 results found

  • КОНСТИТУЦИЯ на Република България
    Štát:
    Bulgaria

    Чл. 30 [...] (4) Всеки има право на адвокатска защита от момента на задържането му или на привличането му като обвиняем.(5) Всеки има право да се среща насаме с лицето, което го защитава. Тайната на техните съобщения е неприкосновена. Чл. 31 [...] (2) Никой не може да бъде принуждаван да се признае за виновен, нито да бъде осъден само въз основа на неговото самопризнание.(3) Обвиняемият се смята за невинен до установяване на противното с влязла в сила присъда.(4) Не се допускат ограничения на правата на обвиняемия, надхвърлящи необходимото за осъществяване на правосъдието.Чл. 56Всеки гражданин има право на защита, когато са нарушени или застрашени негови права или законни интереси. В държавните учреждения той може да се явява и със защитник.

  • European Convention on Human Rights - Article 6
    Štát:
    Austria

    Article 6 – Right to a fair trial

    1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

    2 Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

    3 Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:

    a to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;

    b to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;

    c to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;

    d to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;

    e to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.

  • Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten
    Štát:
    Austria

    Artikel 6 (2) Bis zum gesetzlichen Nachweis seiner Schuld wird vermutet, daß der wegen einer strafbaren Handlung Angeklagte unschuldig ist.

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found