Bias Motive |
Groups |
Key facts | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Netherlands | Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) | 2021 | The Netherlands, Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) (2021), Case no. 20/03005, 6 July 2021, ECLI:NL:HR:2021:1036. | Race/Ethnicity | Migrants | On 19 March 2014 elections for the municipal councils were held. The political party PVV of Geert Wilders participated in those election in two municipalities: Almere and the Hague. On the election night Wilders asked his audience during a meeting of party followers in the Hague: “do you want more or less Moroccans in this city and in the Netherlands?”. In response, the audience - which was instructed beforehand - repeatedly chanted “less”. Subsequently more than 6,000 people pressed charges… | View more |
Netherlands | Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (College voor de Rechten van de Mens) | 2022 | The Netherlands, Netherlands Institute for Human Rights (College voor de Rechten van de Mens) (2022), Opinion number 2022-13, 29 August 2022. | Religion | Muslims | A Muslim woman wearing a headscarf visits a fitness centre for a trial lesson. She wears a headscarf because of her Islamic religious beliefs. The fitness centre employee indicates that it is not allowed to exercise with headscarves, after which the woman leaves the fitness centre. The woman felt discriminated against because of her religious beliefs. She submitted her case to the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights. The fitness centre disputes that the woman was discriminated against and… | View more |
Netherlands | Court of Appeal Arnhem-Leeuwarden (Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden) | 2021 | The Netherlands, Court of Appeal Arnhem-Leeuwarden (Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden) (2021), Case no. 21-006140-19, 16 April 2021 ECLI:NL:GHARL:2021:4154. | Religion | Muslims | Ruling by the Court of Appeal in a case which was referred back by the Supreme Court. This case concerns an anti-Islam held speech held during a public demonstration. On 11 October 2015 during a Pegida demonstration a woman said during her speech: "Another reason to despise and hate Muslims is their insane ideology. Because it's never the religion of peace."" Pegida is pan-European anti-Islam organisation. She placed her speech in written form on her Facebook-page. On 12… | View more |
Netherlands | Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch (Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch) | 2021 | The Netherlands, Court of Appeal 's-Hertogenbosch (Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch) (2021), Case no. 20-003807-17, ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2021:3287, 4 May 2021. | Race/Ethnicity | Muslims | This case concerns a street-cleaner of Sudanese descent who was insulted by a man. It happened in 2015. The street-cleaner saw a man standing under the subway of a shopping centre. The man smashed a beer bottle. The street-cleaner walked up to the man in response, to clean the bottle and the mess immediately. The man shouted at the street-cleaner, "black ape that you are, go back to your country" and "Muslims should go back to the IS", as well as "all blacks should back… | View more |
Romania | The National Council for Combating Discrimination (Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării) | 2022 | The National Council for Combating Discrimination (Consiliul Naţional pentru Combaterea Discriminării) decision no. 388 from 6 July 2022 | Race/Ethnicity, Religion | Muslims | The case concerns a news article that covers different positions from within the Muslim community from Constanta in regard to a statute of a Kazakh composer that was placed there. The petitioner claims that the way a news article portrays the different opinions from the Muslim community and that fact that it claims the community is worried about this statute is discriminatory and it sows discontent within the local Muslim community. | View more |
Sweden | Svea Court of Appeal (Svea Hovrätt) | 2016 | Sweden / Svea Court of Appeal / Case no. B4509-16 | Religion | Muslims | Svea Court of Appeal (Svea hovrätt) found a man guilty of incitement of hatred in a post on a facebook page of a local branch of the Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna). The perpetrator, S.V. posted a copy of a message stating that "horny Muslims" have "sick, devilish lusts". The District Court dismissed the charges against S.V. since the post had only been available for everybody during a maximum of 14 hours. Even though the post was degrading in nature, the District… | View more |
Sweden | Svea Court of Appeal (Svea hovrätt) | 2016 | Sweden / Svea Court of Appeal / Case no. B 4297-16 | Race/Ethnicity | EU citizens & nationals with migrant background | Stockholm District Court (Stockholms tingsrätt) found a man guilty of insult (förolämpning) and abuse (misshandel). The offender had called two women degrading statements (e.g. ”negro” and similar words) when an argument escalated. In addition, the offender hit the women and a third person, who tried to stop the argument, with his fists. | View more |
Sweden | Svea Court of Appeal (Svea Hovrätt) | 2020 | Sweden / Svea Court of Appeal (Svea Hovrätt)/ Case number: B 8211-19 | Religion | Muslims | The prosecutor appealed the District Court’s sentence. The defendant had published derogatory statements about the group Muslims, referring to their religious belief. The statements were in the form of posts related to an article about a person murdered by a knife at an asylum accommodation centre. The article in question was linked to the political party Sweden Democrats’ Facebook page. The Facebook page is open to the public, and the defendant’s statements have been widely disseminated. The… | View more |
Sweden | Supreme Court (Högsta Domstolen) | 2021 | Sweden / Supreme Court / Målnummer Ö 2343-18 | Race/Ethnicity | eu citizens & nationals with migrant background | The case concerned a passenger of Chilean origin (PAG) who was subjected to an extra security check in connection with a domestic flight in Sweden. The Equality Ombudsman (Diskrimineringsombudsmannen, DO) brought an action, claiming that the airline had subjected PAG to direct discrimination by assuming him to be an Arab person and forcing him to undergo an extra security check. The airline had therefore disadvantaged PAG for reasons relating to his physical appearance and ethnicity. The… | View more |
Sweden | Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) | 2020 | Sweden / Supreme Court / Målnummer B 5987-19 | Religion | Muslims | The case concerns agitation against a population group (hets mot folkgrupp) online. The defendant was indicted for commenting on a post in a Facebook group called Political facts (Politikfakta) by writing "Disgusting Muslim bastard" (Äckliga muslimjävel). The Facebook post linked to an article about a man of foreign origin who allegedly had committed an honour-related rape. | View more |
DISCLAIMERThe information presented here is collected under contract by the FRA's research network FRANET. The information and views contained do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA.