Germany / Higher Labour Court of Baden-Württemberg (Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg) / 17 Sa 3/19 / ECLI:DE:LAGBW:2019:1205.17SA3.19.00




Germany / Higher Labour Court of Baden-Württemberg (Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg) / 17 Sa 3/19 / ECLI:DE:LAGBW:2019:1205.17SA3.19.00

View full Case



Decision/ruling/judgment date

Thursday, December 05, 2019

Crime type(s) concerned/related

Incitement to violence or hatred

Related hate bias motivation


Groups affected


Court/Body type

National Court


Higher Labour Court of Baden-Württemberg (Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg)

Key facts of the case

The plaintiff took legal action against an extraordinary termination of his employment contract due to messages he had sent to a colleague of Turkish origin and Muslim faith. These messages included, among others, an image file shwoing a mosque under the heading "In Bavaria a mosque has been opened, and during the first prayer some Bavarians infiltrated and fired shots into the air. I am sending you this recording so you hear how the preacher has changed his prayer…", added by an audio file playing the sound of prayer chants which after being interrupted by shots change to yodelling. Another image file showed an apparently Muslim extended family under the heading 'Many Muslims take a second or third wife whereas we Germans take a second or third job to finance our lives'.

Main reasoning/argumentation

The Court confirmed the validity of the extraordinary termination.

Is the case related to the application of the Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia, the Racial Equality Directive?

Key issues (concepts, interpretations) clarified by the case

The State Labour Court had to examine whether the messages sent by the plaintiff constitute an important reason to justify an extraordinary termination of the contract of employment.

Results (sanctions, outcome) and key consequences or implications of the case

The appeal of the plaintiff was rejected.

Key quotation in original language and translated into English with reference details

"Bei den oben genannten WhatsApp-Nachrichten handelt es sich um Schmähkritik, die nicht von Artikel 5 Absatz 1 GG geschützt ist. Aus Sicht der Kammer kann offenbleiben, ob diese Nachrichten als Satire einzuordnen sind. Einkleidung und Aussagekern der beiden Nachrichten beschränken sich nämlich auf eine Missachtung und Herabwürdigung von Menschen mit muslimischer Religionszugehörigkeit. Die Grenze zur Schmähkritik wird damit jedenfalls überschritten."

"The WhatApp messages are abusive criticism which is not protected by Article 5 (1) of the Basic Law. From the perspective of the court chamber it can remain open whether the messages can be classified as satire. The form and the core of the content of both messages narrow down to the defiance and degradation of persons of Muslim faith. In any case, the line to abusive criticism is thus crossed. "

DISCLAIMERThe information presented here is collected under contract by the FRA's research network FRANET. The information and views contained do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA.