France / Court of cassation / Decision No. 20-83.325 / ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:CR00240
Country
France
Title
France / Court of cassation / Decision No. 20-83.325 / ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:CR00240
View full Case
Year
2021
Decision/ruling/judgment date
Tuesday, March 16, 2021
Incident(s) concerned/related
Incitement to violence or hatred
Related Bias motivation
Religion
Groups affected
Muslims
Court/Body type
National Court
Court/Body
Court of Cassation, Criminal Chamber
Key facts of the case
The case dealt with the sale and advertising on two far-right websites of a leaflet containing the words: "Islam assassin, Islam dehors" (Islam assassin, Islam get out), in white letters, appearing on a blood red background for the first two words and on a black background for the other two words.
Main reasoning/argumentation
The Court of Cassation considered that the terms "Islam assassin Islam dehors" should be assessed considering the extrinsic elements that accompanied them: their appearance on a background of a drawing representing blood and a dagger together with a mosque evoking the Muslim religion, as well as by a text associating the Muslims with Islamists. There is a need to be determine whether these extrinsic elements can be considered to be such as to make the words an exhortation to hatred or violence, against the Muslim community as a whole.
Is the case related to the application of the Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia, the Racial Equality Directive?
Key issues (concepts, interpretations) clarified by the case
The key question was to determine whether the words "Islam assassin Islam dehors" should be assessed in their own right or in the light of the extrinsic elements that accompanied them. In the first approach, that of the Court of Appeal, it is possible to consider that they are part of a debate of general interest relating to the criticism of a religion and the acts that some of its followers commit in its name, without exceeding the admissible limits of freedom of speech. In the second, the one taken by the Court of Cassation, the words may be considered as an exhortation to hatred or violence, against the Muslim community as a whole.
Results (sanctions, outcome) and key consequences or implications of the case
The Court of Cassation considered that the Paris Court of Appeal, in noting the extrinsic elements that accompanied the words "Islam assassin Islam dehors" but without taking them into account in its assessment, did not draw the consequences of its own findings and did not justify its decision. It quashed the judgement and referred the case back to the Paris Court of Appeal, differently composed.
Key quotation in original language and its unofficial translation into English with reference details
"En se déterminant ainsi, et alors qu'elle a relevé que les quatre mots poursuivis étaient présentés sur fond d'un dessin représentant du sang et un poignard ainsi qu'une mosquée évoquant la religion musulmane, et présentés par un texte qui associe par un procédé oratoire, « les islamistes » et « les prétendus musulmans modérés » (…), sans mieux rechercher si ces éléments extrinsèques n'étaient pas de nature à conférer aux propos poursuivis le caractère d'une exhortation à la haine ou à la violence, à l'encontre de la communauté des musulmans dans son ensemble (…), la cour d'appel n'a pas tiré les conséquences de ses propres constatations et n'a pas justifié sa décision."
"In its verdict, and having noted that the four words incriminated appeared on the background of a drawing representing blood and a dagger together with a mosque evoking the Muslim religion, and presented by a text associating "the Islamists" and "the alleged moderate Muslims" (...) in an oratorical process, without better determining whether these extrinsic elements were not likely to make the incriminated words an exhortation to hatred or violence, against the Muslim community as a whole (...), the Court of Appeal did not draw the consequences of its own findings and did not justify its decision."
DISCLAIMERThe information presented here is collected under contract by the FRA's research network FRANET. The information and views contained do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA.