Urziceni Court (Judecătoria Urziceni) Decission no. 710/2021 from 26 May 2021 file no. 3390/330/2020
Country
Romania
Title
Urziceni Court (Judecătoria Urziceni) Decission no. 710/2021 from 26 May 2021 file no. 3390/330/2020
View full Case
Year
2021
Decision/ruling/judgment date
Wednesday, May 26, 2021
Incident(s) concerned/related
Other forms of hate speech
Related Bias motivation
Religion
Groups affected
Muslims
Court/Body type
National Court
Court/Body
Urziceni Court (Judecătoria Urziceni) the decission wa slater upheald by the Ialomița Tribunal in second instance and in third instance by the Bucharest Court of Appeal
Key facts of the case
The case is a tort liability case by which the claimant, a former mayor asked for moral damages from a political opponent in relation to defamatory claims the latter made in several Facebook posts. The defamatory remarks included, among other things, discriminatory remarks in relation to the fact that the claimant belongs to the Muslim faith that Muslims should not be present in Christian churches. The defendant also made a request for moral damages in relation to defamatory statements made by the claimant on Facebook.
Main reasoning/argumentation
The court found that statements made which refer to the religion of the claimants are defamatory, they constitute value judgements which affect not only the claimants but a whole group of people.
Is the case related to the application of the Framework Decision on Racism and Xenophobia, the Racial Equality Directive?
Key issues (concepts, interpretations) clarified by the case
This case looks at opinions and comments made on social networks. The court found that such statements, whenever they are defamatorily can result in moral damages and the author of such statements can be obliged to pay moral compensation for damage caused through such statements.
Results (sanctions, outcome) and key consequences or implications of the case
The court found that both parties made defamatory statements about each other and found that both parties should pay each other 5 000 Ron (approximately 1000 euro) sums which are to be compensated.
The court also decided that both parties are to delate within 30 days all of the defamatory statements made online and that they should refrain from insulting each other any further.
Key quotation in original language and its unofficial translation into English with reference details
“Nu în ultimul rând, referirile la religia fostului edil sunt peiorative şi induc ideea că o persoană de altă religie nu ar trebui să poată să intre într-o biserică ortodoxă şi invers, acest mesaj fiind propagat într-un mediu public şi la care au avut acces numeroase persoane, în considerarea calităţii titularului de cont.
Restul afirmaţiilor legate de religia reclamantului-pârât se încadrează în categoria judecăţilor de valoare care însă, prin natura şi modul, mediul în care sunt exprimate, afectează nu numai reclamantul-pârât, ci o întreagă categorie de persoane având religii diferite de cea ortodoxă.”
"Last but not least, the references to the religion of the former mayor are pejorative and induce the idea that a person of another religion should not be able to enter an Orthodox church and vice versa, this message being propagated in a public environment to which many people had access, considering the quality of the account holder.
The rest of the statements related to the claimant’s religion fall into the category of value judgments which, given the nature, the manure and the by the environment in which they are expressed, affect not only the claimant, but an entire category of people with religions different from the Orthodox one."
DISCLAIMERThe information presented here is collected under contract by the FRA's research network FRANET. The information and views contained do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA.