Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 221 - 240 of 1829
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM 9106/80 N/A BEL 2/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 5 4 Just satisfaction reserved Children s and Young Persons Welfare Act of 8 April 1965 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0229JUD000910680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57445
CASE OF BOUCHELKIA v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUCHELKIA v. FRANCE 23078/93 N/A FRA 1/29/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Civil Code Article 21 27 Law no. 80 9 of 10 January 1980 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 as amended concerning the conditions of entry and residence of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0129JUD002307893https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58014
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE 22070/93 N/A FRA 4/24/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 sections 19 22 25 Law no. 81 973 of 29 October 1981 Law no. 86 1025 of 9 September 1986 Law no. 89 548 of 2 August 1989 Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0424JUD002207093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57991
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE 25404/94 N/A FRA 10/21/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 concerning the conditions of entry and residence of aliens in France as modified by Laws no. 80 9 of 10 January 1980 no. 81 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1021JUD002540494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58106
CASE OF BOULOIS v. LUXEMBOURG
CASE OF BOULOIS v. LUXEMBOURG 37575/04 LANG O. LUX 12/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award 26 126 243 445 13 7 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD003757504 SECOND SECTION CASE OF BOULOIS v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD003757504https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102302
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24839/94 N/A GBR 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58134
CASE OF BOYAJYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BOYAJYAN v. ARMENIA 38003/04 N/A ARM 3/22/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 Remainder inadmissible Articles 91 and 228 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure Government decree n 352 N of 16 March 2006 approving the procedure for compensation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322JUD003800304https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-104064
CASE OF BOYAN GOSPODINOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF BOYAN GOSPODINOV v. BULGARIA 28417/07 SYAROVA E. BGR 4/5/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD002841707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182247
CASE OF BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9659/82 9658/82 N/A GBR 4/27/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Prisons Scotland Act 1952 444 110 451 424 425 429 14 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0427JUD000965982https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57446
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA 11170/84 12876/87 13468/87 N/A AUT 8/28/1991 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d No violation of Art. 6 3 c Pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0828JUD001117084https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57683
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 14553/89 14554/89 N/A GBR 5/26/1993 12:00:00 AM Derogation of Art. 5 3 satisfies the requirements of Art. 15 No violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 13 Prevention of Terrorism Temporary Provisions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001455389https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57819
CASE OF BREYER v. GERMANY
CASE OF BREYER v. GERMANY 50001/12 DEU 1/30/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life 451 429 319 556 268 262 329 333 376 391 238 354 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD005000112 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD005000112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200442
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM 10857/84 N/A BEL 7/7/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001085784https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57611
CASE OF BRIGANDÌ v. ITALY
CASE OF BRIGAND v. ITALY 11460/85 N/A ITA 2/19/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Damage financial award 369 304 445 40 406 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001146085 In the Brigand case The European Court of Human Rights sitting in accordance withArticle ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001146085https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57654
CASE OF BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS 19589/92 N/A NLD 11/20/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No separate issue under P1 1 Act concerning administrative jurisdiction as to decisions of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001958992https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57953
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11209/84 11234/84 11266/84 11386/85 N/A GBR 11/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57450
CASE OF BRONDA v. ITALY
CASE OF BRONDA v. ITALY 22430/93 N/A ITA 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Civil Code Article 333 Code of Civil Procedure Article 373 451 203 425 268 376 238 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093 CASE OF BRONDA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58194
CASE OF BRUALLA GÓMEZ DE LA TORRE v. SPAIN
CASE OF BRUALLA G MEZ DE LA TORRE v. SPAIN 26737/95 ESP 12/19/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Transitional provision no. 2 of Law no. 10/92 of 30 April 1992 which ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1219JUD002673795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58127
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19178/91 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 172 174 2 175 3 289 Planning Inspectorate Executive Agency Framework Document 1992 Town and Country Planning ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57954