Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 541 - 560 of 2927
CASE OF DANILEVICH v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DANILEVICH v. RUSSIA 31469/08 SADOVSKAYA O.A. RUS 10/19/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD003146908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-212836
CASE OF DANILIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DANILIN v. RUSSIA 4176/03 DANILIN O. RUS 9/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 350 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916JUD000417603 FIRST SECTION CASE OF DANILIN v. RUSSIA Application no. 4176/03 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 September 2010 FINAL 16/12/2010 This ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916JUD000417603https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100381
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DANKEVICH v. UKRAINE 40679/98 N/A UKR 4/29/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial period No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later period Violation of Art. 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0429JUD004067998https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61062
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY
CASE OF DARBOE AND CAMARA v. ITALY 5797/17 FERRERO M. CHIARETTO E. ITA 7/21/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0721JUD000579717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218424
CASE OF DARBY v. SWEDEN
CASE OF DARBY v. SWEDEN 11581/85 N/A SWE 10/23/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 and 14 9 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1023JUD001158185https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57642
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL 22600/93 PRT 4/21/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 e Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 76 136 440 86 162 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093 CASE OF DAUD v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58154
CASE OF DAVID v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF DAVID v. MOLDOVA 41578/05 POSTICA A. MDA 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 Non pecuniary damage financial award Articles 302 and 305 of the Code of Civil Procedure Sections 11 28 32 and 39 of the Law on ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD004157805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83466
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 75947/11 MOSKALENKO K. NAPARA Ye. RUS 5/30/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 a Abuse of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD007594711https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173805
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 17674/02 39081/02 ZHERDEV G. BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 7/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701JUD001767402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99750
CASE OF DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE 12964/87 N/A FRA 12/16/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1216JUD001296487https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57778
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 19983/92 N/A BEL 2/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224JUD001998392https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58015
CASE OF DE LEGÉ v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DE LEG v. THE NETHERLANDS 58342/15 HENDRIKS M. NLD 10/4/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD005834215https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219556
CASE OF DE SALVADOR TORRES v. SPAIN
CASE OF DE SALVADOR TORRES v. SPAIN 21525/93 N/A ESP 10/24/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 3 a Constitution Article 24 Criminal Code Articles 10 61 394 para. 4 399 528 529 para. 7 and 535 Code of Criminal Procedure Article 902 Constitutional Court ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1024JUD002152593https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58061
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 6/30/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 13 8 Articles 511 4 L.514 1 and 2 of the Code regulating the entry and residence of aliens and asylum seekers 183 498 444 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0630JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105421
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY
CASE OF DE TOMMASO v. ITALY 43395/09 CONTICCHIO D. ITA 2/23/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Violation of Article 6 Right ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0223JUD004339509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171804
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 6/18/1971 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 4 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57606
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM ARTICLE 50 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 3/10/1972 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0310JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57607
CASE OF DEAK v. ROMANIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF DEAK v. ROMANIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM 19055/05 DRAGOMIR D. ROU GBR 6/3/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Romania No violation of Art. 6 1 the UK Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award Article 43 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603JUD001905505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86729
CASE OF DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DEDOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 7178/03 ZHULANOV Z. RUS 5/15/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0515JUD000717803https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86218