Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3681 - 3700 of 4390
CASE OF SORRENTINO PROTA v. ITALY
CASE OF SORRENTINO PROTA v. ITALY 40465/98 ITA 1/29/2004 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 with regard to one set of proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to one set of proceedings Violation of P1 1 with regard to other proceedings Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129JUD004046598https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61610
CASE OF SORVISTO v. FINLAND
CASE OF SORVISTO v. FINLAND 19348/04 FREDMAN M. FIN 1/13/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 6 1 Violations of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award Chapter 4 section 2 subsection 2 of the Coercive Measures Act Act ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD001934804https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90581
CASE OF SOSINOWSKA v. POLAND
CASE OF SOSINOWSKA v. POLAND 10247/09 MROZEK L. POL 10/18/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 149 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD001024709 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF SOSINOWSKA v. POLAND Application no. 10247/09 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 October 2011 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD001024709https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107053
CASE OF SOUMARE v. FRANCE
CASE OF SOUMARE v. FRANCE 23824/94 N/A FRA 8/24/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 Damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses claim dismissed Code of Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0824JUD002382494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58218
CASE OF SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. UKRAINE 48553/99 N/A UKR 7/25/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected ratione temporis Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine art. 14 Just satisfaction reserved 445 136 40 385 181 180 369 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0725JUD004855399https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60634
CASE OF SOYLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF SOYLU v. TURKEY 43854/98 ALTAY G. OKCUOGLU S. TUR 2/15/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 3 No violation of Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 14 13 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD004385498https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-79488
CASE OF SPACEK, s.r.o. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF SPACEK s.r.o. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 26449/95 CZE 11/9/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected estoppel No violation of P1 1 Official Gazette Act no. 131/1989 section 8 1 b as amended by Act no. 426/1990 Private Business Activities Act no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109JUD002644995https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58358
CASE OF SPADEA AND SCALABRINO v. ITALY
CASE OF SPADEA AND SCALABRINO v. ITALY 12868/87 N/A ITA 9/28/1995 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Law no. 392 of 27 July 1978 section 59 Law no. 25 of 15 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0928JUD001286887https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57937
CASE OF SPK DIMSKIY v. RUSSIA
CASE OF SPK DIMSKIY v. RUSSIA 27191/02 OKUNEV V. RUS 3/18/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318JUD002719102 FIRST SECTION CASE OF SPK DIMSKIY v. RUSSIA Application no. 27191/02 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 18 March ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318JUD002719102https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97783
CASE OF SPORER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF SPORER v. AUSTRIA 35637/03 SPEER M. AUT 2/3/2011 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 14 8 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Articles 166 167 176 of the Civil Code Law Amending ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003563703https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103234
CASE OF SPORRONG AND LÖNNROTH v. SWEDEN
CASE OF SPORRONG AND L NNROTH v. SWEDEN 7151/75 7152/75 N/A SWE 9/23/1982 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Peaceful enjoyment of possessions No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0923JUD000715175https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57580
CASE OF SPURIO v. ITALY
CASE OF SPURIO v. ITALY 23217/94 N/A ITA 9/2/1997 12:00:00 AM 445 41 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002321794 SPURIO GALLO ZILAGHE LAGHI VIERO ORLANDINI AND RYLLO CASES CASE OF SPURIO v. ITALY 26/1996/645/830 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 September 1997 The present ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002321794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58181
CASE OF STÖGMÜLLER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ST GM LLER v. AUSTRIA 1602/62 N/A AUT 11/10/1969 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Just satisfaction reserved 448 227 411 14 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1110JUD000160262 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ST GM LLER v. AUSTRIA Application no 1602/62 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1110JUD000160262https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57582
CASE OF ÜSTÜN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ST N v. TURKEY 37685/02 UTKU B. ATALAY A. TUR 5/10/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 149 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD003768502 SECOND SECTION CASE OF ST N v. TURKEY Application no. 37685/02 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 10 May 2007 FINAL 10/08/2007 This ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD003768502https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80514
CASE OF STĂNCULEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ST NCULEANU v. ROMANIA 26990/15 DRAGOMIR Gh. ROU 1/9/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD002699015https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179886
CASE OF STĘPIEŃ v. POLAND
CASE OF ST PIE v. POLAND 39225/05 N/A POL 12/4/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions 369 304 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD003922505 FOURTH SECTION ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD003922505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114950
CASE OF STĂVILĂ v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ST VIL v. ROMANIA 23126/16 BERAR C. ROU 3/1/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0301JUD002312616https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215921
CASE OF STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 46295/99 N/A GBR 5/28/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Criminal Justice Act 1991 Sections 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528JUD004629599https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60486
CASE OF STALLINGER AND KUSO v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF STALLINGER AND KUSO v. AUSTRIA 14696/89 14697/89 N/A AUT 4/23/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0423JUD001469689https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58029
CASE OF STAMBUK v. GERMANY
CASE OF STAMBUK v. GERMANY 37928/97 N/A DEU 10/17/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Baden W rttemberg Rules of Professional Conduct of the Medical Practitioners Council sections 25 2 27 55 and 58 149 148 265 356 379 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1017JUD003792897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60687