Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 80
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF BEAUMARTIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF BEAUMARTIN v. FRANCE 15287/89 N/A FRA 11/24/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings 445 41 136 181 406 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1124JUD001528789https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57898
CASE OF BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND 10328/83 N/A CHE 4/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected validity of declaration Violation of Art. 6 1 Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0429JUD001032883https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57434
CASE OF BEN YAACOUB v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BEN YAACOUB v. BELGIUM 9976/82 BEL 11/27/1987 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list friendly settlement 445 181 180 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1127JUD000997682 In the Ben Yaacoub case Note by the registry: The case is numbered 8/1985/94/142. The second figure ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1127JUD000997682https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57437
CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS 8848/80 N/A NLD 10/23/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 41 136 180 181 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:1023JUD000884880 COURT PLENARY CASE OF BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:1023JUD000884880https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57436
CASE OF BESNIK CANI v. ALBANIA
CASE OF BESNIK CANI v. ALBANIA 37474/20 HALIMI E. ALB 10/4/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1004JUD003747420https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219773
CASE OF BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS 19589/92 N/A NLD 11/20/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No separate issue under P1 1 Act concerning administrative jurisdiction as to decisions of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001958992https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57953
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19178/91 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 172 174 2 175 3 289 Planning Inspectorate Executive Agency Framework Document 1992 Town and Country Planning ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57954
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA 49429/99 N/A BGR 11/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Government s request for strike out rejected Violations of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71299
CASE OF COYNE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COYNE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25942/94 GBR 9/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Air Force Act 1955 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0924JUD002594294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58097
CASE OF CROMPTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CROMPTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42509/05 LEVYS SOLICITORS GBR 10/27/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 445 13 41 180 181 406 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD004250905 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF CROMPTON v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD004250905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-95364
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 N/A TUR 5/10/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59454
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DEBLED v. BELGIUM 13839/88 N/A BEL 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Royal Decree no. 79 of 10 November 1967 relating to the Ordre des m decins Articles 12 and 25 para. 4 al. 2 Act of 31 March 1967 Royal Decree of 6 February 1970 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001383988https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57888
CASE OF DEMICOLI v. MALTA
CASE OF DEMICOLI v. MALTA 13057/87 N/A MLT 8/27/1991 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected six month period Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0827JUD001305787https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57682
CASE OF DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF DIMITROV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 77938/11 VASILEV V. BGR 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD007793811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145224
CASE OF DOLIŃSKA-FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND
CASE OF DOLI SKA FICEK AND OZIMEK v. POLAND 49868/19 57511/19 GREGORCZYK ABRAM S. EJCHART DUBOIS M. POL 11/8/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 a Ratione materiae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Six month period ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1108JUD004986819https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213200
CASE OF ENTLEITNER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ENTLEITNER v. AUSTRIA 29544/95 AUT 8/1/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 as regards independency and impartiality Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards lack of a public hearing Administrative Court Act section 39 2 no. 6 445 385 296 13 181 180 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0801JUD002954495https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59075
CASE OF ETTL AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ETTL AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 9273/81 AUT 4/23/1987 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 385 181 180 41 570 423 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0423JUD000927381 In the case of Ettl and Others Note by the Registrar: The case is numbered 12/1985/98/146. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0423JUD000927381https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57484