Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9
Conclusions 2014 - Russian Federation - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2014 Russian Federation Article 4 2 RUS 04 02 000 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted ESC2014/def/RUS/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2014/def/RUS/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2018 - Andorra - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2018 Andorra Article 4 2 AND 04 02 000 25/03/2019 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Andorra. In reply to ESC2018/def/AND/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2018/def/AND/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2022 - Georgia - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2022 Georgia Article 4 2 GEO 04 02 000 20/01/2023 02/02/2023 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Georgia ESC2022/def/GEO/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2022/def/GEO/4/2/EN
Conclusions XVIII-2 - United Kingdom - Article 4-2
Conclusions XVIII 2 United Kingdom Article 4 2 GBR 04 02 000 30/06/2007 30/06/2007 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information provided in the UK report. The ESCXVIII-2/def/GBR/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XVIII-2/def/GBR/4/2/EN
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Union syndicale des magistrats administratifs (USMA) v. France, Complaint No. 84/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Union syndicale des magistrats administratifs USMA v. France Complaint No. 84/2012 FRA 04 02 000 02/12/2013 02/04/2014 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON ESCcc-84-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-84-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération française de l'Encadrement CFE-CGC v. France, Collective Complaint No. 16/2003
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration fran aise de l Encadrement CFE CGC v. France Collective Complaint No. 16/2003 FRA 02 01 000 04 02 000 06 04 000 27 00 163 12/10/2004 31/03/2005 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-16-2003-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-16-2003-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v. France, Collective Complaint No. 54/2008
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions CESP v. France Collective Complaint No. 54/2008 FRA 02 01 000 04 02 000 02/12/2010 19/01/2011 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS ESCcc-54-2008-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-54-2008-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v France, Collective Complaint No. 57/2009
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions CESP v France Collective Complaint No. 57/2009 FRA 04 02 000 01/12/2010 04/04/2011 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption : 1 ESCcc-57-2009-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-57-2009-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Bulgaria, Collective Complaint No. 125/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Bulgaria Collective Complaint No. 125/2016 BGR 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 02 000 04 03 000 04 04 000 04 05 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 120 163 91 121 163 91 122 163 91 123 163 91 197 163 2019 12 06 ESCcc-125-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-125-2016-dmerits-en