Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 26
Conclusions 2010 - Netherlands - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2010 Netherlands Article 4 2 NLD 04 02 000 14/12/2010 25/11/2010 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by the ESC2010/def/NLD/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2010/def/NLD/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2018 - Andorra - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2018 Andorra Article 4 2 AND 04 02 000 25/03/2019 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Andorra. In reply to ESC2018/def/AND/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2018/def/AND/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2018 - Netherlands - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2018 Netherlands Article 4 2 NLD 04 02 000 24/01/2019 25/03/2019 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by the ESC2018/def/NLD/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2018/def/NLD/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2018 - "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2018 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Article 4 2 MKD 04 02 000 24/01/2019 25/03/2019 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in ESC2018/def/MKD/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2018/def/MKD/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2022 - Bulgaria - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2022 Bulgaria Article 4 2 BGR 04 02 000 20/01/2023 02/02/2023 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by ESC2022/def/BGR/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2022/def/BGR/4/2/EN
Conclusions 2022 - Finland - Article 4-2
Conclusions 2022 Finland Article 4 2 FIN 04 02 000 20/01/2023 02/02/2023 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Finland. ESC2022/def/FIN/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2022/def/FIN/4/2/EN
Conclusions IX-1 - Iceland - Article 4-2
Conclusions IX 1 Iceland Article 4 2 ISL 04 02 000 30/06/1985 30/06/1985 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work With regard to Iceland. the Committee noted that Act No. 55/1980 prohibits wage ESCIX-1/def/ISL/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=IX-1/def/ISL/4/2/EN
Conclusions X-1 - Iceland - Article 4-2
Conclusions X 1 Iceland Article 4 2 ISL 04 02 000 30/06/1987 30/06/1985 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work According to the ICELANDIC report all collective agreements provide for a higher rate of ESCX-1/def/ISL/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=X-1/def/ISL/4/2/EN
Conclusions XII-1 - Iceland - Article 4-2
Conclusions XII 1 Iceland Article 4 2 ISL 04 02 000 30/09/1991 30/09/1991 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The situation in Iceland has previously been considered as satisfactory because ESCXII-1/def/ISL/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XII-1/def/ISL/4/2/EN
Conclusions XIV-2 - United Kingdom - Article 4-2
Conclusions XIV 2 United Kingdom Article 4 2 GBR 04 02 000 30/11/1998 30/11/1998 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee recalls that the United Kingdom has no statutory law of general ESCXIV-2/def/GBR/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIV-2/def/GBR/4/2/EN
Conclusions XIX-3 - Denmark - Article 4-2
Conclusions XIX 3 Denmark Article 4 2 DNK 04 02 000 17/12/2010 25/11/2010 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Denmark. ESCXIX-3/def/DNK/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIX-3/def/DNK/4/2/EN
Conclusions XIX-3 - United Kingdom - Article 4-2
Conclusions XIX 3 United Kingdom Article 4 2 GBR 04 02 000 17/12/2010 03/12/2010 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by ESCXIX-3/def/GBR/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIX-3/def/GBR/4/2/EN
Conclusions XX-3 - Iceland - Article 4-2
Conclusions XX 3 Iceland Article 4 2 ISL 04 02 000 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Iceland. ESCXX-3/def/ISL/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-3/def/ISL/4/2/EN
Conclusions XXII-3 - Germany - Article 4-2
Conclusions XXII 3 Germany Article 4 2 DEU 04 02 000 20/01/2023 02/02/2023 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 2 Increased remuneration for overtime work The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Germany ESCXXII-3/def/DEU/4/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-3/def/DEU/4/2/EN
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Union syndicale des magistrats administratifs (USMA) v. France, Complaint No. 84/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Union syndicale des magistrats administratifs USMA v. France Complaint No. 84/2012 FRA 04 02 000 02/12/2013 02/04/2014 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON ESCcc-84-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-84-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération Française de l’Encadrement (CGC) v. France, Collective Complaint No. 9/2000
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration Fran aise de l Encadrement CGC v. France Collective Complaint No. 9/2000 FRA 02 01 000 04 02 000 16/11/2007 16/11/2007 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS ESCcc-09-2000-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-09-2000-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération française de l'Encadrement CFE-CGC v. France, Collective Complaint No. 16/2003
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration fran aise de l Encadrement CFE CGC v. France Collective Complaint No. 16/2003 FRA 02 01 000 04 02 000 06 04 000 27 00 163 12/10/2004 31/03/2005 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-16-2003-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-16-2003-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération française de l'encadrement CFE-CGC v. France, Collective Complaint No. 56/2009
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration fran aise de l encadrement CFE CGC v. France Collective Complaint No. 56/2009 FRA 02 01 000 04 02 000 20 00 000 27 00 163 91 197 163 91 206 163 91 207 163 23/06/2010 14/01/2011 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-56-2009-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-56-2009-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits : Confédération générale du travail(CGT) v. France, complaint No. 154/2017
Decision on the merits : Conf d ration g n rale du travail CGT v. France complaint No. 154/2017 FRA 04 02 000 2018 10 18 2019 03 15 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 18 October 2018 ESCcc-154-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-154-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v. France, Collective Complaint No. 38/2006
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions CESP v. France Collective Complaint No. 38/2006 FRA 04 02 000 03/12/2007 07/04/2008 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 3 ESCcc-38-2006-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-38-2006-dmerits-en