Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17
ARBEITER v. Austria
ARBEITER v. Austria AUT 25/04/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary restriction without sufficient and relevant reason by an injunction of domestic courts in the context of a political debate on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-481
DICHAND AND OTHERS v. Austria
DICHAND AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the injunction prohibiting the applicant editor and media company from repeating certain critical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-829
FREIHEITLICHE LANDESGRUPPE BURGENLAND v. Austria
FREIHEITLICHE LANDESGRUPPE BURGENLAND v. Austria AUT 18/07/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant party s conviction for insult and to pay damages following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-875
INFORMATIONSVEREIN LENTIA v. Austria
INFORMATIONSVEREIN LENTIA v. Austria AUT 28/11/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression and information: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant association s inability to obtain radio and television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-893
JERUSALEM v. Austria
JERUSALEM v. Austria AUT 27/05/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the injunction prohibiting the applicant from repeating certain statements made in the municipal council in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-805
KRONE VERLAG GMBH & CO. KG v. Austria
KRONE VERLAG GMBH CO. KG v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to an injunction prohibiting the applicant newspaper company to publish the photograph of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-873
KRONE VERLAG GMBH & CO. KG v. Austria (no. 2)
KRONE VERLAG GMBH CO. KG v. Austria no. 2 AUT 06/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a coercive indemnity under the Media Act for the failure to respect the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-917
KRONE VERLAG GMBH & COKG N° 3 v. Austria
KRONE VERLAG GMBH COKG N 3 v. Austria AUT 11/03/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to an injunction under the Unfair Competition Act banning the applicant media company from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-911
NEWS VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria
NEWS VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria AUT 11/04/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts prohibition to publish the picture of a suspect in the context of reports on criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-837
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG, STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria AUT 28/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the insufficiently reasoned refusal by a regional authority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-493
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria AUT 13/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the first applicant s conviction to a suspended fine and the media company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-915
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria (no. 3)
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria no. 3 AUT 10/04/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Interference without sufficient and relevant reasons due to the awarding of compensation following the allegedly unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-491
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria
TELE 1 PRIVATFERNSEH v. Austria AUT 19/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal to allow the applicant company to set up and operate a television transmitter. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-843
VEREINIGUNG DEMOKRATISCHER SOLDATEN & GUBI v. Austria
VEREINIGUNG DEMOKRATISCHER SOLDATEN GUBI v. Austria AUT 19/12/1994 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to the Ministry of Defence s refusal to place the periodical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-623
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979