Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 94
ACHLEITNER v. Austria
ACHLEITNER v. Austria AUT 23/01/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings on civil rights and obligations and criminal charges before administrative authorities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-955
ALGE v. Austria
ALGE v. Austria AUT 22/04/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations or the determination of criminal charges before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-909
ARBEITER v. Austria
ARBEITER v. Austria AUT 25/04/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary restriction without sufficient and relevant reason by an injunction of domestic courts in the context of a political debate on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-481
AVISO ZETA AG v. Austria
AVISO ZETA AG v. Austria AUT 21/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of impartiality of the Supreme Court as its composition had failed to meet the Convention standard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49791
BEER MARIE-LUISE v. Austria
BEER MARIE LUISE v. Austria AUT 18/05/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings on account of the absence of a public hearing in proceedings before the authorities competent for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-685
BENES v. Austria
BENES v. Austria AUT 17/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of respective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45997
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria
BETTINA MALEK v. Austria AUT 21/01/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1039
BIEGLER BAUGESMBH (LP) v. Austria
BIEGLER BAUGESMBH LP v. Austria AUT 11/07/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-849
BUCHBERGER v. Austria
BUCHBERGER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Transfer of custody of the applicant s sons to the Youth Welfare Office without sufficiently involving her in the decision making process. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-853
C.H. v. Austria
C.H. v. Austria AUT 03/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the refusal of the applicant s claim for compensation in respect of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-811
CIFTCI v. Austria
CIFTCI v. Austria AUT 20/08/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant being sentenced to a prohibition of residence following a conviction for drugs EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-777
COOKE v. Austria
COOKE v. Austria AUT 08/02/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a public hearing on appeal before the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-791
DICHAND AND OTHERS v. Austria
DICHAND AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 26/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the injunction prohibiting the applicant editor and media company from repeating certain critical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-829
E.B. AND OTHERS v. Austria
E.B. AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 07/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination and lack of effective remedy: Dismissal of requests to delete convictions under former Article 209 of the Criminal Code sexual relations of a male EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1107
EDELMAYER v. Austria
EDELMAYER v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-869
EIGENSTILLER v. Austria
EIGENSTILLER v. Austria AUT 14/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of divorce proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1101
EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY PRESS GMBH v. Austria
EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY PRESS GMBH v. Austria AUT 24/09/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of equality of arms due to a correction by the Supreme Court of a clerical mistake which went EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1007
FIDLER GERTRUDE v. Austria
FIDLER GERTRUDE v. Austria AUT 15/04/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to give a decision in due time on his request for access to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-783
FIDLER v. Austria
FIDLER v. Austria AUT 15/04/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to give a decision in due time on his request for access to his children. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-781
FREIHEITLICHE LANDESGRUPPE BURGENLAND v. Austria
FREIHEITLICHE LANDESGRUPPE BURGENLAND v. Austria AUT 18/07/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant party s conviction for insult and to pay damages following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-875