Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
BARTENBACH v. Austria
BARTENBACH v. Austria AUT 20/06/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Length and unfairness of criminal administrative proceedings for illegally employing a foreign citizen breach of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-549
BEER v. Austria
BEER v. Austria AUT 06/02/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in that the applicant had not been informed of an appeal brought by her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-833
LANZ v. Austria
LANZ v. Austria AUT 01/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to interference with defence rights in that contacts with the defence counsel during detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-779
MLADOSCHOVITZ v. Austria
MLADOSCHOVITZ v. Austria AUT 15/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair enforcement proceedings with regard to alleged arrears with maintenance payments due to the infringement of the equality of arms EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-487
MOSER v. Austria
MOSER v. Austria AUT 21/12/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to transfer of custody of a child to the Youth Welfare Office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1033
OSINGER v. Austria
OSINGER v. Austria AUT 24/06/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public hearing in succession proceedings Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-957
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG, STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria AUT 28/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the insufficiently reasoned refusal by a regional authority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-493
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
PFEIFER v. Austria
PFEIFER v. Austria AUT 15/02/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure by domestic courts to protect the applicant s reputation against defamatory statements published by the chief editor in a domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-479
SCHWEIGHOFER AND OTHERS v. Austria
SCHWEIGHOFER AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 09/01/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-571
SZUCS v. Austria
SZUCS v. Austria AUT 24/11/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in compensation proceedings for the applicants detention on remand following the discontinuance of or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-733
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979