Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
ANAKOMBA YULA v. Belgium
ANAKOMBA YULA v. Belgium BEL 10/06/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Discrimination/Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal by the domestic courts to grant legal aid in proceedings in which a mother contested her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1533
GOKTEPE v. Belgium
GOKTEPE v. Belgium BEL 02/09/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the lack of individual examination of the question of the extent of the applicant s guilt. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1467
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LACHIRI v. Belgium
LACHIRI v. Belgium BEL 18/12/2018 00:00:00 08/01/2019 12:04:55 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Unjustified interference following exclusion from a courtroom for refusing to remove one s hijab violation of Article 9 . Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51109
LONCKE v. Belgium
LONCKE v. Belgium BEL 25/12/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Lack of effective access to a court in tax proceedings equivalent to the determination of a criminal charge as the deposit requested to secure costs was disproportionate to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1501