Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
HIRVISAARI v. Finland
HIRVISAARI v. Finland FIN 27/12/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of reasoning of the Pensions Board s and Insurance Court s decisions. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4860
JOKELA v. Finland
JOKELA v. Finland FIN 21/08/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionated interference due to the discrepancy between the market value and the authorities and court s assessment of the market value of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4806
K. AND T. v. Finland
K. AND T. v. Finland FIN 12/07/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in public care under emergency and normal orders failure to reunite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4794
K.P. v. Finland
K.P. v. Finland FIN 31/08/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the failure to communicate to the applicant the opinions obtained ex officio concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4812
KALLIO v. Finland
KALLIO v. Finland FIN 22/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of tax surcharge proceedings due to the administrative courts refusal to hold oral hearings and to hear the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4922
KAURA v. Finland
KAURA v. Finland FIN 23/09/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of administrative proceedings due to a refusal by the Insurance Court to hold an oral hearing. The proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4950
KUOPILA v. Finland
KUOPILA v. Finland FIN 27/07/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms on the ground that material submitted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4800
LAUNIKARI v. Finland
LAUNIKARI v. Finland FIN 05/01/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4820
NUUTINEN v. Finland
NUUTINEN v. Finland FIN 27/06/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of custody proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4816
PIETILAINEN v. Finland
PIETILAINEN v. Finland FIN 27/01/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4832
SUOMINEN v. Finland
SUOMINEN v. Finland FIN 22/07/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial as the first instance court refused without reasoned decision to admit part of the evidence the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4830
TURKIYE IS BANKASI v. Finland
TURKIYE IS BANKASI v. Finland FIN 18/09/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings in particular before the Court of Appeal of Helsinki. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4780
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984