Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 29
A.S. v. Finland
A.S. v. Finland FIN 28/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of adequate opportunity to put questions to the minor victim of an offence with respect to the latter s videotaped account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5956
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
EKHOLM v. Finland
EKHOLM v. Finland FIN 24/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings and failure to enforce final judicial decisions. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5966
H.A.L. v. Finland
H.A.L. v. Finland FIN 07/07/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of administrative proceedings due to the failure to provide reasons for certain decisions and lack of sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4838
K.P. v. Finland
K.P. v. Finland FIN 31/08/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the failure to communicate to the applicant the opinions obtained ex officio concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4812
KALLIO v. Finland
KALLIO v. Finland FIN 22/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of tax surcharge proceedings due to the administrative courts refusal to hold oral hearings and to hear the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4922
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland FIN 14/06/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of respective remedy: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and in several cases also absence of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5000
KAURA v. Finland
KAURA v. Finland FIN 23/09/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of administrative proceedings due to a refusal by the Insurance Court to hold an oral hearing. The proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4950
LAAKSONEN v. Finland
LAAKSONEN v. Finland FIN 12/07/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the applicants right to be informed about the charges in criminal proceedings and to prepare their defence as well EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4876
LOMASEITA OY AND OTHERS v. Finland
LOMASEITA OY AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 05/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms as the applicants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4854
LONNHOLTZ v. Finland
LONNHOLTZ v. Finland FIN 25/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4868
M.S. v. Finland
M.S. v. Finland FIN 22/06/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial as the applicant was not informed of a statement received by the appellate court and was not given the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4848
MARTTINEN v. Finland
MARTTINEN v. Finland FIN 21/07/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial and the right to silence and not to incriminate oneself in proceedings to recover a debt the debtor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4938
MILD v. Finland
MILD v. Finland FIN 26/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the applicants could examine persons regarded as witnesses whose statements were taken into EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4840
MUTTILAINEN v. Finland
MUTTILAINEN v. Finland FIN 22/08/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an oral hearing before the Court of Appeal in criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4910
NATUNEN v. Finland
NATUNEN v. Finland FIN 30/06/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the applicant s defence due to the destruction by the authorities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4882
PIETILAINEN v. Finland
PIETILAINEN v. Finland FIN 27/01/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4832
POSTI AND RAHKO v. Finland
POSTI AND RAHKO v. Finland FIN 21/05/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court to contest restrictions on fishing imposed by administrative regulations. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4802
R.H. v. Finland
R.H. v. Finland FIN 02/09/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the Appeal Court s failure to make a full examination of the case or to organise an oral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4890
S. H. v. Finland
S. H. v. Finland FIN 29/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of medical insurance proceedings due to the inability for the applicant to comment on two medical opinions included EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4990