Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ELSHOLZ v. Germany
ELSHOLZ v. Germany DEU 13/07/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic court s refusal to grant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38316
EVERS v. Germany
EVERS v. Germany DEU 28/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the domestic courts refusal in 2013 to allow that he be heard in person in the proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55849
HOFFMANN v. Germany
HOFFMANN v. Germany DEU 11/01/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s inability to get access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38328
JALLOH v. Germany
JALLOH v. Germany DEU 11/10/2006 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Forcible administration of emetics inducing vomiting to obtain swallowed evidence and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38366
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KREBS v. Germany
KREBS v. Germany DEU 20/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant charged with a criminal offence to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law violation of Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55463
MADAUS v. Germany
MADAUS v. Germany DEU 09/09/2016 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of the lack of an oral hearing in civil proceedings under the Criminal Rehabilitation Act Article 6 1 . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38244
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
NEZIRAJ v. Germany
NEZIRAJ v. Germany DEU 08/02/2013 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court and of the right to defend oneself through a lawyer in criminal proceedings due to the appellate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38212
ORHAN CACAN v. Turkey
ORHAN CACAN v. Turkey TUR 04/10/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to a fair trial on account of the inability of the applicants to examine or have examined witnesses whose statements were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37172
PENCHEVI v. Bulgaria
PENCHEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 10/05/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the infringement of the applicants right to respect of their family life as the court proceedings concerning the request to allow the second applicant to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3927
STOLLENWERK v. Germany
STOLLENWERK v. Germany DEU 07/12/2017 00:00:00 24/01/2018 09:34:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms because the Court of Appeal took its decisions relating to the continuation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48749