Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
GOLDNAGL v. Austria
GOLDNAGL v. Austria AUT 07/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack effective protection of the right to family life in the context of return proceedings under the Brussels IIa Regulation following the removal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47679
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
M.A. v. Austria
M.A. v. Austria AUT 15/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack effective protection of the right to family life in the context of return proceedings under the Brussels IIa Regulation following the removal of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-521
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy ITA 23/05/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 12:28:48 Case Description: The case concerns violations arising from an extraordinary rendition operation against the first applicant an Egyptian cleric suspected of terrorism related offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28282
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TONIOLO v. San Marino and Italy
TONIOLO v. San Marino and Italy SMR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:41:24 Case Description: Unlawful detention pending extradition: Domestic law was not sufficiently accessible precise and foreseeable in its application to avoid the risk of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11208