Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania LTU 07/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to a tribunal due to the refusal of the Supreme Court in 2017 to partly exempt him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55627
CERNIUS AND RINKEVICIUS v. Lithuania
CERNIUS AND RINKEVICIUS v. Lithuania LTU 18/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: The Cernius and Rinkevicius case concerns the domestic courts refusal to award the applicants legal costs after successful labor litigation of 2017. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55471
CINGA v. Lithuania
CINGA v. Lithuania LTU 31/01/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate deprivation of the applicant s property in 2008 following the domestic courts decisions to annul the administrative orders by which a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49057
GULIJEV v. Lithuania
GULIJEV v. Lithuania LTU 16/03/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to rejection of the applicant s request to renew his residence permit and subsequent expulsion from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4241
JANKAUSKAS v. Lithuania
JANKAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 06/07/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the opening of correspondence of a remand prisoner by prison authorities. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4193
JUCYS v. Lithuania
JUCYS v. Lithuania LTU 08/04/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to prolonged inability of an innocent owner to recover possessions seized in criminal proceedings furs despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4239
KAZLAUSKAS AND NANARTONIS v. Lithuania
KAZLAUSKAS AND NANARTONIS v. Lithuania LTU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to prohibition on prisoners receiving electronic items from their friends or charity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50927
LANIAUSKAS v. Lithuania
LANIAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns the ill treatment inflicted by prison officers on the applicant during a prison riot in 2016 violation of Article 3 . Status of Execution: An action EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60329
MISIUKONIS AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
MISIUKONIS AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 15/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to a court s order to pay the market value of plots of land restored to the applicants by the State EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46107
NAKU v. Lithuania
NAKU v. Lithuania LTU 08/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate restriction of access to court due to the domestic courts dismissal of the applicant s claim in an employment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46083
PAKSAS v. Lithuania
PAKSAS v. Lithuania LTU 06/01/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Electoral rights: Disproportionate restriction of the right to free elections due to the permanent and irreversible nature of the applicant s disqualification from standing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4324
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania
SEKMADIENIS LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 30/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary and disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a fine on a commercial company by the State Consumer Rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49465
STEMPLYS AND DEBESYS v. Lithuania
STEMPLYS AND DEBESYS v. Lithuania LTU 17/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and protection of family life: Inadequate conditions of the applicants detention and disproportionate limitations on long stay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48137