Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
BALJAK AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BALJAK AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 04/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the domestic courts dismissal of their claim for damages against the State in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60191
DEL RIO PRADA v. Spain
DEL RIO PRADA v. Spain ESP 21/10/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Retroactive penalty imposed due to a change of case law: application of a new precedent set by the Supreme Court known as the Parot doctrine in 2006 which was not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3547
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The cases mainly concern the deaths of the applicants next of kin as a result of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37076
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
GREGORIOU v. Cyprus
GREGORIOU v. Cyprus CYP 09/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before civil courts lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect.The violations were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1992
KRISTON v. Hungary
KRISTON v. Hungary HUN 24/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of movement and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Maintenance of a travel ban by withdrawal of the applicant s passport between 1995 and 2009 pending EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11084
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
RADANOVIC v. Croatia
RADANOVIC v. Croatia HRV 21/03/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to repossess property for a prolonged period of time as a result of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10079
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
VIJATOVIC v. Croatia
VIJATOVIC v. Croatia HRV 16/05/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to determine a new time after the Constitutional Court s abrogation in 1997 of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10267