Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. Italy
IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. Italy ITA 28/07/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference with and systematic infringement of landlords property rights due to failure to implement domestic court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43835
KANALA v. Slovakia
KANALA v. Slovakia SVK 30/01/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to acquisition in execution proceedings of the applicant s share in a property by the co owner exercising a pre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7771
KRISTON v. Hungary
KRISTON v. Hungary HUN 24/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of movement and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Maintenance of a travel ban by withdrawal of the applicant s passport between 1995 and 2009 pending EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11084
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
NASTOU v. Greece (no. 1)
NASTOU v. Greece no. 1 GRC 16/04/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the lengthy dispute over the State s claim of ownership of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15577
RADANOVIC v. Croatia
RADANOVIC v. Croatia HRV 21/03/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to repossess property for a prolonged period of time as a result of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10079
RADU v. the Republic of Moldova
RADU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/07/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference on account of the disclosure of information of a medical nature by a medical institution to a person s employer EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6876
SADAK AND OTHERS v. Turkey (no. 2)
SADAK AND OTHERS v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 06/11/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Electoral rights: Disproportionate interference due to the automatic deprivation of parlamentarians of their mandates following the dissolution of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5478
SANTORO v. Italy
SANTORO v. Italy ITA 01/10/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Freedom of movement and electoral rights: Unlawful restriction of the applicant s liberty of movement and inability of the applicant to vote in the parliamentary elections 1996 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42975
SERGHIDES AND CHRISTOFOROU v. Cyprus
SERGHIDES AND CHRISTOFOROU v. Cyprus CYP 05/02/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference with property rights due to expropriation of land without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1978
VIJATOVIC v. Croatia
VIJATOVIC v. Croatia HRV 16/05/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to determine a new time after the Constitutional Court s abrogation in 1997 of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10267
VOLOKITIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
VOLOKITIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 03/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: This case concerns the State s failure to redeem the 1982 State loan bonds which are in the applicants possession. The Court observed that in 1995 Russia had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50975
ZEMAN v. Austria
ZEMAN v. Austria AUT 29/09/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment as a result of the application of the amended Pension and Pension Allowance Act according to which widowers EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1049