Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 36
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom GBR 27/01/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings before the Court Marial due to its lack of impartiality and independence and absence of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2532
ANGUELOVA v. Bulgaria
ANGUELOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 13/09/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Suspicious death of the applicant s son in police custody ill treatment by law enforcement agents and lack of timely EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3587
BERLINSKI v. Poland
BERLINSKI v. Poland POL 20/09/2002 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the deprivation of the applicants of their defence rights on the ground of the prosecutor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17767
CANTAFIO v. Italy
CANTAFIO v. Italy ITA 26/09/1995 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in order to resolve a dispute dating from 1986 with the Municipality of Decollatura since the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45090
CIANETTI v. Italy
CIANETTI v. Italy ITA 10/11/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings for abuse of the applicant s position as a civil servant and forgery of documents as two judges who EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44009
EDWARDS AND LEWIS v. the United Kingdom
EDWARDS AND LEWIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 27/10/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in criminal proceedings due to two judicial decisions to withhold certain evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2238
G.W. v. the United Kingdom
G.W. v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/09/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of independence and impartiality of the court martial system convened under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2528
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey TUR 10/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concern the failure of the national authorities to comply with numerous administrative court decisions delivered in favour of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47927
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of Navy court martial criminal proceedings resulting in convictions due to the courts lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2232
ILIYA PETROV v. Bulgaria
ILIYA PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the State to comply with its positive obligation to protect the applicant s life the applicant having been seriously injured in an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3849
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of impartiality of the commanding officer deciding on the necessity of a soldier s detention playing a central role in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2496
JOSEF FISCHER v. Austria
JOSEF FISCHER v. Austria AUT 17/04/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to end effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Supreme Court concerning the applicant s plea of nullity as the General Attorney EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-861
KANSAL v. the United Kingdom
KANSAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/11/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of fair criminal proceedings due to breach of right not to incriminate oneself in view of the use made by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2834
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KUTIC v. Croatia
KUTIC v. Croatia HRV 01/06/2002 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to legislation of 1996 and 1999 staying all civil proceedings concerning claims for damages in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12139
LANE v. the United Kingdom
LANE v. the United Kingdom GBR 01/03/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2468
LETINCIC v. Croatia
LETINCIC v. Croatia HRV 03/08/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial on account of a failure of the administrative authorities to include the applicant in the process of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10067
LOUKA v. Cyprus
LOUKA v. Cyprus CYP 02/11/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1980
MORRIS* v. the United Kingdom
MORRIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2592