Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 106
IPSD AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IPSD AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of assembly: Disproportionate interference due to the dissolution of an association campaigning against unemployment and excessively high prices on the ground EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37216
JAKOBSKI v. Poland
JAKOBSKI v. Poland POL 07/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Refusal to provide a detainee with a meat free diet in conformity with the requirements of his Buddhist faith. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18973
JOHNSON v. the United Kingdom
JOHNSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/01/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Unlawful detention for failure to pay the community charge poll tax absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2476
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom
JORDAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of impartiality of the commanding officer deciding on the necessity of a soldier s detention playing a central role in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2496
JUGHELI AND OTHERS v. Georgia
JUGHELI AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 13/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Protection of private life / home: Disproportionate interference on account of the environmental pollution emanating from the thermal power plant in close EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48067
KANALA v. Slovakia
KANALA v. Slovakia SVK 30/01/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to acquisition in execution proceedings of the applicant s share in a property by the co owner exercising a pre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7771
KLAMECKI v. Poland (no. 2)
KLAMECKI v. Poland no. 2 POL 03/07/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of correspondence and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Monitoring of correspondence in detention on remand and refusal of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17799
KLAUS AND YURI KILADZE v. Georgia
KLAUS AND YURI KILADZE v. Georgia GEO 02/05/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:47 Case Description: Deficient legal framework granting compensation to nationals who sustained various forms of political persecution and oppression on the territory of the former EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5904
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
LUGHOFER v. Austria
LUGHOFER v. Austria AUT 30/11/1999 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings before the administrative court in a case concerning the adjustment of the property titles. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-771
LYUBOMIR POPOV v. Bulgaria
LYUBOMIR POPOV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3799
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MAIRE v. Portugal
MAIRE v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to enforce judicial decisions relating to the exercise by the applicant of custody of his child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9963
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 26/09/1996 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of Jehovah s witnesses for having used a private place for meetings prayers and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22122
MCDAID AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
MCDAID AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/10/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court martial due to its failing independence and impartiality. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2526
MILD v. Finland
MILD v. Finland FIN 26/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the applicants could examine persons regarded as witnesses whose statements were taken into EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4840
MILLS v. the United Kingdom
MILLS v. the United Kingdom GBR 05/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court martial due to its failing independence and impartiality. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2538
MOORE & GORDON v. the United Kingdom
MOORE GORDON v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/12/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court martial due to its failing independence and impartiality. Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2564