Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
BARRILLOT v. France
BARRILLOT v. France FRA 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in particular excessive length of the pre trial investigation stage. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32553
BELZIUK v. Poland
BELZIUK v. Poland POL 25/03/1998 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the impossibility for the detained accused to participate in the hearing before the court of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17739
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention decided in the Army by the Commanding Officer who does not present EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2674
BUBBINS v. the United Kingdom
BUBBINS v. the United Kingdom GBR 17/06/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Effective remedies: Absence of an effective remedy to seek compensation for non pecuniary damages following the death of a relative shot by the police having been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2654
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/11/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of rights in detention effective remedy: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation to India lack of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2388
GILLAN AND QUINTON v. the United Kingdom
GILLAN AND QUINTON v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/06/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of adequate safeguards on police powers to stop and search individuals suspected of terror offences under section 44 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2890
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability for the applicants to challenge the government policy on night flights at Heathrow airport allegedly interfering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2548
HIRST v. the United Kingdom
HIRST v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive interval between the reviews concerning the applicants continued detention as discretionary life prisoners and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2600
HOUSE OF MACEDONIAN CIVILIZATION AND OTHERS v. Greece
HOUSE OF MACEDONIAN CIVILIZATION AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 09/10/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the refusal of the Greek courts to register the association of the House of Macedonian Civilization on the grounds that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15697
JOHNSON v. the United Kingdom
JOHNSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/1997 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful continued detention in a psychiatric hospital of an individual who was no longer suffering from mental illness and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2390
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
LOVYGINY v. Ukraine
LOVYGINY v. Ukraine UKR 23/09/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Right to life: Death of the applicants son a police officer accidentally shot dead by a colleague during a police training exercise in 2000 as well as lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32268
MARANGOS v. Cyprus
MARANGOS v. Cyprus CYP 14/04/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the prohibition of male homosexual activity. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1970
MCGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
MCGLINCHEY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure of prison authorities to provide accurate means of monitoring the health condition of a heroin addicted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2656
MODINOS v. Cyprus
MODINOS v. Cyprus CYP 22/04/1993 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the prohibition of male homosexual activity. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1960
OZGUR RADYO-SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Turkey
OZGUR RADYO SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the freedom of expression of the applicant broadcasting companies due to warnings and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37376
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455