Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom
ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/02/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on grounds of gender between widows and widowers regarding social security benefits and/or an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2786
BLACKGROVE v. the United Kingdom
BLACKGROVE v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/07/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of property and discrimination: Discriminatory treatment on grounds of gender between widows and widowers regarding social security benefits and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2909
BRAGA v. Republic of Moldova
BRAGA v. Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection from ill treatment / right to liberty and security / right to individual petition: Unlawful arrest conviction and sentencing to imprisonment on the basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57849
BRAGA v. Russia
BRAGA v. Russia RUS 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Protection from ill treatment / right to liberty and security / right to individual petition: Unlawful arrest conviction and sentencing to imprisonment on the basis of decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49151
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/11/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of rights in detention effective remedy: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation to India lack of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2388
DEVENNEY v. the United Kingdom
DEVENNEY v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/06/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to fact that the Secretary of State s certificate on the applicant s discharge on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2416
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The cases mainly concern the deaths of the applicants next of kin as a result of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37076
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
JABARI v. Turkey
JABARI v. Turkey TUR 11/10/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Refusal of an asylum request solely on the procedural grounds under the Asylum Regulation without consideration of the real risk to be EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5514
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
LEMOINE v. France
LEMOINE v. France FRA 17/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court to contest a decision taken by his employer the French railway company discharging him from his post EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33109
MURRAY v. the Netherlands
MURRAY v. the Netherlands NLD 26/04/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:15:35 Case Description: Inhuman and/or degrading treatment on account of the de facto irreducibility of life sentence imposed on the applicant who suffered from a mental illness and was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5944
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/12/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to property Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 due to an interference with their shareholding in a limited liability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3857
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia
TSINTSABADZE v. Georgia GEO 18/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This group of cases comprises 15 judgments concerning various substantive between 1999 and 2014 and procedural between 1999 and 2020 violations of Article 2 and Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5830
TWALIB v. Greece
TWALIB v. Greece GRC 09/06/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to insufficient time and facilities for the applicant s lawyer assigned by the court to prepare EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22140
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
UMO ILINDEN AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the unjustified refusals of the courts between 1999 and 2015 to register associations the aim of which is to achieve the recognition of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3657
VIRABYAN v. Armenia
VIRABYAN v. Armenia ARM 02/01/2013 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: These cases concern substantive and procedural violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention 1 on account of the applicants death or torture and the lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-355
ZHURA v. Ukraine
ZHURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/09/2022 00:00:00 26/09/2022 09:53:59 Case Description: The case concerns the expropriation of a land plot and a house from the applicant s father by the authorities in order to build a metro line in 1999. In particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61185