Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 22
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
BEER MARIE-LUISE v. Austria
BEER MARIE LUISE v. Austria AUT 18/05/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings on account of the absence of a public hearing in proceedings before the authorities competent for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-685
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece GRC 16/12/1997 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the applicant church s inability to take legal action as a result of civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22146
CRAXI v. Italy
CRAXI v. Italy ITA 05/03/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction based exclusively on pre trial statements made by co accused persons EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42845
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/11/2007 00:00:00 12/06/2018 11:57:23 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination in the enjoyment by the applicants of their right to education due to their much higher likelihood because of their Roma 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The cases mainly concern the deaths of the applicants next of kin as a result of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37076
GALEA AND PAVIA v. Malta
GALEA AND PAVIA v. Malta MLT 11/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal proceedings finished in 1999 in Galea and Pavia and ongoing in Spiteri as well as of constitutional redress EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55613
GARTUKAYEV v. Russia
GARTUKAYEV v. Russia RUS 13/03/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern unlawful restrictions of the applicants right to liberty of movement in that in 1999 and 2000 they had not been permitted on a single occasion to enter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13599
JOHN MURRAY v. the United Kingdom
JOHN MURRAY v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/02/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to denial of access to legal advice during the first 24 to 48 hours of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2254
KANSAL v. the United Kingdom
KANSAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/11/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of fair criminal proceedings due to breach of right not to incriminate oneself in view of the use made by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2834
KAYA AND SEYHAN v. Turkey
KAYA AND SEYHAN v. Turkey TUR 15/12/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This case concerns unjustified interference with the applicants right of freedom of association in that they were subjected to disciplinary proceedings and received a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37234
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHOROSHENKO v. Russia
KHOROSHENKO v. Russia RUS 30/06/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the right to respect family life on account of restrictions during the first ten years of detention on family visits from 1999 until 2009 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13875
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
NANKOV v. Bulgaria
NANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/09/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand and of criminal proceedings. Articles 5 3 and 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14267
QUINN v. the United Kingdom
QUINN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/04/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to denial of access to legal advice during the first 24 to 48 hours of detention in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2398
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Electoral rights protection of property functioning of justice and lack of remedy: Disproportionate and unlawful refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13549
SIGURDARDOTTIR v. Islande
SIGURDARDOTTIR v. Islande ISL 30/05/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Rejection by district court of the applicant s request for compensation in respect of her arrest and detention on remand although EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom
SZULUK v. the United Kingdom GBR 02/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of correspondence in detention: Unjustified monitoring by prison authorities of medical correspondence between the applicant a convicted prisoner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2804