Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
FEDOTOVA v. Russia
FEDOTOVA v. Russia RUS 13/09/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention/protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention/ right of individual petition: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13573
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability for the applicants to challenge the government policy on night flights at Heathrow airport allegedly interfering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2548
IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
IBRAHIM AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/09/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: delay in providing access to a lawyer to one of four applicants during police questioning relying on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2210
J-P.D.V. v. France
J P.D.V. v. France FRA 12/10/1994 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Excessive length of detention on remand as well as telephone conversations intercepted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31362
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
MULLER v. France
MULLER v. France FRA 17/03/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32941
NASTOU v. Greece (no. 1)
NASTOU v. Greece no. 1 GRC 16/04/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the lengthy dispute over the State s claim of ownership of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15577
NILSEN & JOHNSEN v. Norway
NILSEN JOHNSEN v. Norway NOR 25/11/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicants conviction in civil defamation proceedings following the publication of critical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-175
PADALOV v. Bulgaria
PADALOV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/11/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the refusal to grant free legal assistance resulting in a conviction. Article 6 1 3c EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14673
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PEREIRA HENRIQUES v. Luxemburg
PEREIRA HENRIQUES v. Luxemburg LUX 09/08/2006 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the accidental death of the applicant s husband and father and lack of an effective remedy to seek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-113
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109
SELMOUNI v. France
SELMOUNI v. France FRA 28/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in police custody: Ill treatment amounting to torture of a Moroccan Dutch national and excessive length of subsequent criminal proceedings to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32983