Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 46
ABBAS v. France
ABBAS v. France FRA 20/10/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to a three year exclusion order concerning an Algerian national. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32062
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
BALAN v. the Republic of Moldova
BALAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/04/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference as a result of the unlawful use as a background for the identity cards issued by the Ministry of Internal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6790
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom
BOWMAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/02/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s prosecution for having distributed leaflets indicating that certain political candidates EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2434
BRUMARESCU v. Romania
BRUMARESCU v. Romania ROU 28/10/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice / protection of property: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the Supreme Court s annulment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15965
CERNEA v. Romania
CERNEA v. Romania ROU 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive length of the criminal proceedings between 2000 and 2011 against the applicant on suspicion of bribe taking and abuse of office and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51079
CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. France
CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. France FRA 29/04/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property / discrimination / freedom of association: Disproportionate interference due to the imposition on landowners to join approved hunting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32979
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
CRAXI v. Italy
CRAXI v. Italy ITA 17/10/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference in the context of criminal proceedings during which transcripts of interceptions of the suspect s telephone conversation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28182
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
FEDOTOVA v. Russia
FEDOTOVA v. Russia RUS 13/09/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention/protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention/ right of individual petition: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13573
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/05/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence and lack of a remedy: Unlawful interference due to the use of covert listening devices in residences or the workplace EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2464
GRIGORIADES v. Greece
GRIGORIADES v. Greece GRC 25/11/1997 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the applicant s conviction for insulting the army in a letter due to the imprecise wording of the Military Criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22142
GUNAL v. Turkey
GUNAL v. Turkey TUR 10/07/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26516
INTRIERI v. Italy
INTRIERI v. Italy ITA 29/08/1996 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference on account of the excessive length of proceedings brought by the applicant against a judicial decision declaring her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45168
ISILDAK v. Turkey
ISILDAK v. Turkey TUR 30/12/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:27:27 Case Description: The case concerns unjustified interference with the applicant s right to respect of his home on account of the search carried out in his workshop by police officers without a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37064
JANKAUSKAS v. Lithuania
JANKAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 06/07/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the opening of correspondence of a remand prisoner by prison authorities. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4193