Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 44
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
BELOZOROV v. Russia
BELOZOROV v. Russia RUS 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55229
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14094
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BROWN v. the United Kingdom
BROWN v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life / discrimination: Investigation into the applicant s sexual orientation and his discharge from the Royal Air Force pursuant to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2666
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
CLINIQUE DES ACACIAS v. France
CLINIQUE DES ACACIAS v. France FRA 13/01/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the right of the applicants private hospitals to an adversarial trial insofar as their appeals EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33235
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
CRAXI v. Italy
CRAXI v. Italy ITA 17/10/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference in the context of criminal proceedings during which transcripts of interceptions of the suspect s telephone conversation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28182
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
ELAHI v. the United Kingdom
ELAHI v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/09/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful production of tape recordings made from covert listening equipment in the homes of the applicants and in one case lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2872
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
GILLAN AND QUINTON v. the United Kingdom
GILLAN AND QUINTON v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/06/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of adequate safeguards on police powers to stop and search individuals suspected of terror offences under section 44 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2890
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom
GOVELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/05/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence and lack of a remedy: Unlawful interference due to the use of covert listening devices in residences or the workplace EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2464
HALFORD v. the United Kingdom
HALFORD v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/06/1997 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Illegal interferences due to the interception of telephone calls made on the applicant s office telephone linked to internal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2362
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability for the applicants to challenge the government policy on night flights at Heathrow airport allegedly interfering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2548
J-P.D.V. v. France
J P.D.V. v. France FRA 12/10/1994 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Excessive length of detention on remand as well as telephone conversations intercepted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31362