Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 181 - 200 of 266
OZGUR RADYO-SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Turkey
OZGUR RADYO SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM AS. v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the freedom of expression of the applicant broadcasting companies due to warnings and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37376
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
P.B. v. France
P.B. v. France FRA 01/11/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand and excessive length of criminal proceedings. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32166
PADALOV v. Bulgaria
PADALOV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/11/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the refusal to grant free legal assistance resulting in a conviction. Article 6 1 3c EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14673
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PAPON v. France
PAPON v. France FRA 25/10/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court on account of the forfeiture of the applicants appeal on points of law under the Criminal Procedure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32649
PARTNERS 2000 KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary
PARTNERS 2000 KFT AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 22/03/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10605
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria
PATRIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 22/11/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The case of Patrikova concerns three different violations of Art. 1 of Prot. 1 due to : 1. the unlawful and arbitrary seizure and damage to the applicant s merchandise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3819
PAUDICIO v. Italy
PAUDICIO v. Italy ITA 12/11/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure by the authorities to comply with an order for the demolition of a building unlawfully built close to the applicant s home despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28224
PELLEGRINI v. Italy
PELLEGRINI v. Italy ITA 20/10/2001 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the failure of domestic courts to ensure that the applicant s defence rights had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45122
PEREIRA HENRIQUES v. Luxemburg
PEREIRA HENRIQUES v. Luxemburg LUX 09/08/2006 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the accidental death of the applicant s husband and father and lack of an effective remedy to seek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-113
PEREZ DE RADA CAVANILLES v. Spain
PEREZ DE RADA CAVANILLES v. Spain ESP 28/10/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the rejection of the applicant s reposici n as being out of time following EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3455
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine (no. 2)
PETUKHOV v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: These cases 1 concern the systemic problem of the irreducibility of life sentences in Ukraine violations of Article 3 . Under Article 46 of the Convention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52757
POBORNIKOFF v. Austria
POBORNIKOFF v. Austria AUT 03/10/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a public hearing on appeal. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-817
POITRIMOL v. France
POITRIMOL v. France FRA 23/11/1993 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court and thus of a fair trial on account of the declaration of inadmissibility ipso jure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32907
POLIZZI v. Italy
POLIZZI v. Italy ITA 12/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of labour court proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42455
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
POSOKHOV v. Russia
POSOKHOV v. Russia RUS 04/06/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the district court hearing the applicant s case could not be considered a tribunal established EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27538
PRINCIPE v. Italy
PRINCIPE v. Italy ITA 19/12/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of tax administrative proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42913
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596